First off: What I said was"Gamergate wants to play games that are fun." And a bit more explaining it IN DEPTH. So If you're going to troll on that point, do it accurately. If you cared to notice I didn't say WE.
(With this mistake, your angle has become clear: I think you believe that KYM's Gamergate thread built to discuss happenings in Gamergate, must be full of Gamergate supporters with some sway. I believe you have mistaken archivists whom are discussing and wondering about the future of the movement as we have as much sway over Gamergate as it unfolds as a butterfly IN a hurricane.)
WE refers to the users on Know Your Meme. And this is an ARCHIVAL site. This section in particular taking of events and articles related to Gamergate. Mentions, related figures of the hashtag, attacks involved and tactics end up getting discussed here. (So if you want to go on a tangent, Scott Adams, Successful Cartoonist and "whiner" does end up getting related into Gamergate by a few proxies.)
BUT since were here on KYM, which is unbound from The amendments since it's a website owned by a cooperation and not the US government, using that particular colorful flourish to describe Mr. Adams is in violation of rule #6 which you can read at any time: " Be Friendly We want our forums to be welcoming place for both old and new users. Please keep your comments and posts constructive and considerate in tone. If you observe a user breaking a rule, try advising the user in the right direction instead of posting insults or harsh criticisms. If the user persists, contact a forum moderator."
Consider this an advice on correcting that tone, because breaking that rule, which I have archived by quoting you, has left me with that instruction to behave accordingly.
Second: I see you know what Gamergate SHOULD do. But you're still one person trying to commandeer a bunch of archivists that are more interested in looking after the event as it goes, that believe applying facts to remove slander and shatter narratives, and actively call things as they are rather than what someone asks to "listen and believe." (It's becoming frightfully clear you jumped back into this thread on an account that blogged here 10 months ago and resumed activity, with no other contributions in that blank span. So that's… interesting for lack of a better word.) Plus what would you do if you convinced those going to this thread? No offense meant to those that vote on what I have to say, but maybe an approximation of 7 people? That's your victory? Convincing the people that read this thread that your idea of a communist takeover of the American system is a swell idea? There's more people talking about this in the un-official Gamergate reddit! AND to further top off the flaw in your revolutionary idea, those that comment here are from all over the globe, not just America.
In short. Cut it with the historical platitudes. Communism has proven not to work and what you're trying to do, convince Gamergate to uprise against Captialism, won't work here because the users in this thread are global, not American, and are more concerned with how the event Gamergate is being archived than how Gamergate should act.
Also, to those that read this far and know I'm not talking to them but about them: Trust, but Verify.
(Seriously, look into the account, dude just stopped blogging here a while back, posted in two other threads, and then came in 9-10 months later with this "Big picture" bit.)
@Phantomazing
Also, glad we could help, Academian! Here's hoping you get a good grade! (Not sure if I helped or not, but hey. Best of luck to you! And you can add more for the final draft.)
Oh right I gotta make this stuff relevant.
So for more news on events related to Gamergate:
FNAF creator trolls Games journalists