Fun thing I learned in terms of Academic corruption (again, thanks to Adam Ruins Everything.) Some Journalistic sources will publish anything if you pay them enough money. A.R.E. sent a synopsis of the episode they prove this (in Adam ruins Nutrition, airs tomorrow) as an academic journal and got it published here so they could prove a point that they can cite it as if it were a source.
What this implies is that there probably should be more skepticism in fact checking now that even "facts" could possibly falsified (Check sources of sources, who published what, relationships of the authors…)
Also the episode cites a recent instance of media fooling where John Bohannon got a hoax article published in spring of this year talking about how chocolate could help people lose weight. (The real reason for the study was to test to see if journalists would pick up on it.) Link
So how does this tie into gamergate?
It shows how to be skeptical or, if you want to abuse it, use shoddy publishing sites to make "sources" to prove your point, even if it's wrong. Consider this an update on how to trust but verify.
Edit: Trying to get a textile link to work
2nd edit: This Link to further information (yes it's i09, but hey, the story is real) revealing how John Bohannon pulled it off, made a several red herrings that real journalists should have picked up on, and mentioned a about how he did a sting operation a year before to prove that people don't really peer review (publishing several fake articles.)
TL;DR: How easy it is to get false information to get published as fact and how to get the media to fall for it because there's fake journals and real journals that don't do any research.