Juul pods are considered dangerous by anti-drug companies. All they say are e-cigarretes contain addictive nicotine. That's it. They give us no further information other than the fact that it's addictive because of "harmful" chemicals that just relax the brain. Most studies show that vaping actually helps smokers quit, though too much overexposure can lead to side effects. Other than that, any cons e-cigarretes come with are extremely minimal, and I feel like these anti-drug companies only tested juul pods on dying homeless men and claim that their "research can help us". Instead, they try to scare us away from vaping like showing that vapors can turn into parasites and ASMRs of eating toenails. If there are any side effects, they should warn us to be careful about using pods instead of forcing us to quit because of concentrated nicotine free of tobacco, the stuff that causes cancer in the first place.
I think the real issue of drug-related problems is alcohol, in which thousands of people die from drinking instead of vaping. Even if there were deaths related to juul pods, they're almost non-existent. Is this a problem? Because this stuff is buzzing around now. I can't ignore these people that stand against vaping when there's nothing to worry about. In fact, I think these anti-vaping ads are actually making the smoking problem worse seeing as how smokers revert to cigarettes shortly after watching these ads. Is there any way for them to stop?
Forums / Discussion / Serious Debate
14,150 total conversations in 684 threads
Vaping Movement
Last posted
Jul 01, 2019 at 01:23PM EDT.
Added
Jun 24, 2019 at 06:11PM EDT
13 posts
from
10 users
Cool, but how does this relate to optimizing the thrust/weight ratio of our fighter aircraft?
Kommando_Kaijin wrote:
Cool, but how does this relate to optimizing the thrust/weight ratio of our fighter aircraft?
Fighter… aircraft?
Thank you Juul marketing exec #374
In all seriousness I’m glad vaping is mocked, it’s still addictive, even if it isn’t as bad for you as smoking
also alchohol being a horrible narchotic doesn’t make vaping/smoking good
While I agree that some companies are going overboard, e-cigs can cause cancer too. There are some reasons why even smoking e-cigs can still be bad for you. ANY carcinogen can cause cancer, and e-cigs are no exception to this rule. The vape liquids can be toxic as well, despite what many people have been told. They are still dangerous to use. And yes, smoking cigarettes are worse, and yeah there's worse drugs out there, but it doesn't change the fact that e-cigs ARE STILL DANGEROUS. Saying that alcohol is worse than e-cigs is irrelevant. They are both dangerous, and it doesn't make e-cigs any better.
vapes are the fedoras of mouths
Sorry I had to post that. It seems you people don't really like this post.
Artichoke wrote:
vapes are the fedoras of mouths
fuck you
What about vaping weed? That's less addictive than vaping nicotine (and arguable better, anyway) and less harmful than smoking weed.
Tinderfox wrote:
What about vaping weed? That's less addictive than vaping nicotine (and arguable better, anyway) and less harmful than smoking weed.
any amount of smoking is a poor idea, the lungs weren't designed to inhale any kind of smoke
Maybe if you're Chinese your future lineage can develop lungs that can inhale industrial smog and live in a few generations
RaggensGameplay wrote:
Sorry I had to post that. It seems you people don't really like this post.
Don't worry dude I agree with the sentiment, honestly I rather be surrounded by vapeheads then faggots smoking fags