And yeah I'll say up front a lot of it has more to do with when I express opinions on media I happen to like. Specifically I'll sometimes say crap like "don't judge it until you play it" only to then start doing shit like "well if the majority reviews say Mighty No 9 is mediocre I guess I'll stick with that opinion myself despite never playing it."
Other times I instead do things like use reviews that align with my personal opinions in order to reinforce said opinions and basically just end up disregarding reviews that say otherwise. For example I'm prone to using certain reviews from Jim Sterling's past to disregard certain opinions I hear from him that I disagree with (for example him giving Mario Kart 7 a 5/10 for "being more of the same" but yet giving Modern Warfare 3 a 9.5/10 for apparently "changing things up"), but yet I'll also tell people to stick mainly to reviews from The Completionist or GameXplain if they want an opinion on Star Fox Zero, as these reviews are mostly positive ones that align more with my own positive opinions on the game, a game which, I'll be honest, has gotten pretty mixed opinions overall over one major factor (namely the fact the game forces the use of GamePad controls with no option for a "traditional" control scheme).
Plus part of me can't help but notice the irony in people taking a review from IGN kinda seriously (Mighty No 9) when yet IGN has also been mocked very often in the past for things like "giving God Hand a 3/10" or "7.8, too much water," so maybe this shows really we're all like this and I'm not as big of a hypocrite as I'm thinking I am, but yet I still feel rather unsure about myself in this matter.