"No they wouldn’t. Unlike Israel, most other countries understand the threat isn’t the nation itself now. They go for the enemy within the nation, not random civilians. While civilian casualties are expected, soldiers are punished for war crimes and have to at least try not murder everyone in sight. The point here is that they are doing what is probably the right thing, just in a backwards and unproductive way. And there are still some idiots that support this stupid way of fighting"
yeah, send soldiers into hostile terretory where every terrorists can jump out of any corner, and rain down heavy MG fire from any window, WITHOUT air support, artillery support and tank support.
tell me one nation that did this retarded thing and i will change your mind.
and for the THRID time, these houses were all supposed to be EMPTY of civilians, anyone who didn't want to fight, had PLENTY of time to flee, anyone who didn't is ok with sharing a room with armed terrorists and a soon-to-be casualty of war.
"Wait, so now they all bad for not opposing terrorists the people who use TERROR to get what they want. So I see, it’s just like we should have killed all people from Afghanistan because they are complacent to the Taliban. Sound logic there, mate"
first, Hamas is a terrorist group against israel, not gaza, as they were democratically elected to rule the region. it has the population's nearly full support.
AGAIN if they are ok with terrorists using their back yards and hospitals for launch sites THEY SHOULD NOT BE THERE. they didn't force anyone to stay in their homes. they stayed out of their free will.
furthermore, they gathered around these launchers to watch them, go.
do you really want to tell me that afghan citizens just stayed in taliban warzones? no, they got the hell out of there, and they still got killed because of missfires.
"This is just funny because not only does it imply you don’t see the other people as human, you think that it is not worth a small force of soldiers to go into an area and go into a house to take down more terrorists and have less civilian casualties but to instead blow up a house with innocent people inside because they might harbour some bad people. I honestly don’t get how someone who doesn’t care about anyone but his own people expects others to listen."
another brilliant display of absolute ignorance about warfare in urban combat.
A. as mentioned already, no civilians were supposed to be there in the first place.
B. after the tanks/artillery fired at said house, the soldiers will rush in and clear it of any remaining threats after some of them died and the rest are supprssed and shell-shocked.
C. and yes, if it's possible i wholeheartedly believe that its better to blow up an entire house than to breach it. i don't want any of our soldiers to die. and civilians are not supposed to die because
they SHOULDN'T BE THERE.
"The problem is, like you, they assume all of them are a potential threat, with no actual evidence. They are allowed do this shit on suspicion, that’s not right."
the army has intelligence, it has recon, it has eavesdroppers and spies, when they suspect there is a threat somewhere, it will be very wise to listen to them.
"Think about it this way. If Israel was truly doing nothing wrong, how and why are people all over the world condemning their actions? I’m pretty sure it’s hard for a lot of people around the world to disagree with a country that is truly doing everything right."
if jews aren't actually murdering babies to make matzhos out of them why did most of the world belive so 200 years go?
if all the wars in israel were done out of self defense why do people believe its the most aggressive country in the middle east?
if israel is a democratic country with equal rights to all religions, ethnicitys, and sexual orientations why do people believe its an apartheid state?
same answers to all of those questions: people are prone to believing to lies and biased media.
"What about all the people fighting back because the IDF murdered there innocent families, huh. It’s almost as if you don’t see the fact not all of them are doing it for those reasons. You are assuming all your enemies are religious zealots and then you claim you don’t think that but continue to contradict yourself."
i have never said ONCE that their hatred is tied with religion i never said. they are not religious zealots.
being hateful and racist has nothing to do with it. because i just mentioned how even their religious leaders can be easily killed off if they say there should be peace with israel.
as i said their main reason to fight is because israel has no right to exist on 'their lands' and that no one but other arabs. again, i say this after i STUDIED the conflict for 2 years.
but hey, they could somehow be understood if they actually fought other armed forces, but in fact their main targets are old men and childeren.
"What about all the people fighting back because the IDF murdered there innocent families,"
huh, killing innocent people for revenge? ah that is SUCH a noble deed now, god bless.
with that logic, Gaza would be nothing but a nuclear wasteland by now.
"What you have to understand is that quite frankly no one gives a damn about your opinions. You can’t make them. You can try convince them, but your arguments are heavily biased and you fail to realize that, you honestly refuse any other point of view and then when other people give you reasons why you are wrong in their eyes, you act like the infant you are and pretend that no one is actually answering you. It’s akin to closing your eyes and sticking your fingers in your ears."
soooo let me get this straight:
my argument is biased, because i base them around facts.
i refuse other points of view, even though i took my time to look at all the evidence thrown at me, and provide counter evidence.
i act like an infant because i disagree with people.
im closing my eyes an ears even though i bother to read every single one of your atrocious and obnoxious posts infested with misinformation, and try explaining you errors politely and constructively.
and then you stoop to the lowest possible low and insult me personally, how sad and pathetic.
you call me an immature kid, when you are the only one who acts like one.
i presented facts and evidence before you and you dismissed them by insulting me some more.
you are the only baby here, and it appears you also soiled your diaper. again. let adults handle this argument, your time has clearly passed.