Artichoke wrote:
A coomer, a social outcast, an introvert, and a KYM user walk into a bar
He orders a drink
Last posted
Apr 24, 2021 at 01:33PM EDT.
Added
Apr 16, 2021 at 08:37PM EDT
157 posts
from
41 users
Don't mind me, just watching over seeing how things play out, occassionally throwing peanuts at the combatants if things start to get dull.
SchAltogether wrote:
Don't mind me, just watching over seeing how things play out, occassionally throwing peanuts at the combatants if things start to get dull.
Peanuts? Peanuts aren't going to rouse us.
The peanut:
inb4 knowyourmeme bans the peanut gallery
Individual wrote:
@Kenetic Kups
And ?
Just fun to be called a commie one day and a fascist the next
@Kenetic
I still don't see how this have anything to do with the conversation.
Individual wrote:
@Kenetic
I still don't see how this have anything to do with the conversation.
You claimed most of us are rightists, when in fact Kinetic is a centrist Chad like me.
Your action don't reflect that.
uhh bro why wouldn’t I be a rightist? it literally has the word 'right' in the name, how can it not be correct
Individual wrote:
Your action don't reflect that.
Have you not seen the massive down votes I get whenever there's another mass shooting and I suggest repealing the Second Amendment?
No, and I don't see how this make you a centrist.
I don't even think centrism exist.
Individual wrote:
No, and I don't see how this make you a centrist.
I don't even think centrism exist.
Okay, ideologue.
>centrist
>chad
Pick one
TripleA9000 wrote:
>centrist
>chadPick one
Extremism is cringe. Nuance is based.
Dracorex wrote:
Have you not seen the massive down votes I get whenever there's another mass shooting and I suggest repealing the Second Amendment?
Don't bother with him Draco the simple fact we make fun of "Social Justice" Morons almost daily here and reject partisan rhetoric is enough for him to label all of us "right-wing"
Thats what happens when you let yourself get assimilated to political tribalism you see the "enemy" everywhere
Griff the Hoplite wrote:
Don't bother with him Draco the simple fact we make fun of "Social Justice" Morons almost daily here and reject partisan rhetoric is enough for him to label all of us "right-wing"
Thats what happens when you let yourself get assimilated to political tribalism you see the "enemy" everywhere
It's funny but also sad. I've been a registered Democrat for 15 years but because I don't follow the party line 100% I'm apparently an alt right sympathizer.
I never said you was an right-wing sympatizer, just that I don't think that centrism really exist.
Also don't bother to Griff he's an unhinged right-wing loony who will call anyone criticize right-wing has "liberal tribalist" despite the call out for support to racism comment, quick mockery of any "sjw" even in tragic event, like the mass shooting that have immigrant commiting it instead of the usual right-wing nuts.
Individual wrote:
I never said you was an right-wing sympatizer, just that I don't think that centrism really exist.
Also don't bother to Griff he's an unhinged right-wing loony who will call anyone criticize right-wing has "liberal tribalist" despite the call out for support to racism comment, quick mockery of any "sjw" even in tragic event, like the mass shooting that have immigrant commiting it instead of the usual right-wing nuts.
Individual wrote:
I never said you was an right-wing sympatizer, just that I don't think that centrism really exist.
Also don't bother to Griff he's an unhinged right-wing loony who will call anyone criticize right-wing has "liberal tribalist" despite the call out for support to racism comment, quick mockery of any "sjw" even in tragic event, like the mass shooting that have immigrant commiting it instead of the usual right-wing nuts.
No, because Griff actually treats me like an equal who can form his own opinions instead of someone who has been indoctrinated.
Also, if SJW's don't want to be mocked, they need to stop doing stupid things.
Then you don't know who Griff is really is.
And sure using a tragic event, disregarded the life lost, just to make joke to "own the libs", will sure make stop the """sjw"" to do stupid thing.
For someone who claim to complain about the regular mass shooting, you seems pretty chill about it.
Individual wrote:
Then you don't know who Griff is really is.
And sure using a tragic event, disregarded the life lost, just to make joke to "own the libs", will sure make stop the """sjw"" to do stupid thing.
For someone who claim to complain about the regular mass shooting, you seems pretty chill about it.
You know Indi if you are gonna accuse someone of many different bullshit atleast make it believable please
You all know theres a nice thread you could argue politics in instead of this one right?
Can we dab on the jannies again.
RandomMan wrote:
Can we dab on the jannies again.
The following is said with utmost respect to you, RandomMan. You are clearly a long-time moderator of this site and have accrued many titles. Your say on this matter does hold significant weight, much more so than me, one who only very very recently made an account just a week or so ago.
I have to ask: how is it ALL of you mods agree with locking the shortstack gallery?
And if you don't, WHY pray tell has not one of you dared to unlock it when it is directly related to this site's mission to document memes, on top of the fact content such as shortstacks is popular with users which in turn is important to the site's bottomline? By the site's own logic it seems practically against its own rules to block genuine meme documentation because a mod is prudish. I keep repeating myself here but, Tumblr had a similar mindset to ban in banning all NSFW before they dropped from 1 billion dollar value to 3 million. That might not matter to mods who have no economic interest in the site, but maybe it should matter because it shows mods are actively ostracizing the users they are supposed to help by not solving this problem for users.
Do you guys seriously think we have to censor images of sexually attractive short fictional characters because someone vehemently insists they are something they are not? And if you don't, then unlock it instead of sitting back and watching users react to a problem moderators created. This will set a bad precedent for future mod-user relations if the precedent is simply: "we don't care how good your arguments are or how vehement you all collectively disagree, because we are in charge not you."
I understand the argument I do not own or have a right to this site. I am not 'entitled' to this website as TripleA9000 pointed out. Is entitlement really necessary for moderators to value their users and said users' reasons, though? What about simply valuing this site's core mission of meme documentation, is it entitled of me to want that upheld even when the memes are sexual in nature? I accept at minimum the latter as a justified entitlement, so long as KnowYourMeme insists that is what this site is for.
Again, full respect, nothing impolite meant here. I only mean to state what I believe is observable at face value to a normal user thinking about this situation. Naturally there are nuances to this I am probably not picking up, hence I look to you for some guidance on this matter. Thank you for your time.
Crispy Cream wrote:
The following is said with utmost respect to you, RandomMan. You are clearly a long-time moderator of this site and have accrued many titles. Your say on this matter does hold significant weight, much more so than me, one who only very very recently made an account just a week or so ago.
I have to ask: how is it ALL of you mods agree with locking the shortstack gallery?
And if you don't, WHY pray tell has not one of you dared to unlock it when it is directly related to this site's mission to document memes, on top of the fact content such as shortstacks is popular with users which in turn is important to the site's bottomline? By the site's own logic it seems practically against its own rules to block genuine meme documentation because a mod is prudish. I keep repeating myself here but, Tumblr had a similar mindset to ban in banning all NSFW before they dropped from 1 billion dollar value to 3 million. That might not matter to mods who have no economic interest in the site, but maybe it should matter because it shows mods are actively ostracizing the users they are supposed to help by not solving this problem for users.
Do you guys seriously think we have to censor images of sexually attractive short fictional characters because someone vehemently insists they are something they are not? And if you don't, then unlock it instead of sitting back and watching users react to a problem moderators created. This will set a bad precedent for future mod-user relations if the precedent is simply: "we don't care how good your arguments are or how vehement you all collectively disagree, because we are in charge not you."
I understand the argument I do not own or have a right to this site. I am not 'entitled' to this website as TripleA9000 pointed out. Is entitlement really necessary for moderators to value their users and said users' reasons, though? What about simply valuing this site's core mission of meme documentation, is it entitled of me to want that upheld even when the memes are sexual in nature? I accept at minimum the latter as a justified entitlement, so long as KnowYourMeme insists that is what this site is for.
Again, full respect, nothing impolite meant here. I only mean to state what I believe is observable at face value to a normal user thinking about this situation. Naturally there are nuances to this I am probably not picking up, hence I look to you for some guidance on this matter. Thank you for your time.
stinky hat
Individual wrote:
No, and I don't see how this make you a centrist.
I don't even think centrism exist.
>i on't think centrists exist
-500 iq take
genuine question, what makes someone a right or left winger according to you?
kek
C_Mill24 wrote:
I'd rather have locked comments of a shitty fetish entry than believe eugenics is a net positive like your stupid ass.
How is this relevant to the conversation.
Like, at all?
Alpha Shitlord wrote:
How is this relevant to the conversation.
Like, at all?
#KeneticKupsIsOverParty2021
Alpha Shitlord wrote:
How is this relevant to the conversation.
Like, at all?
The good ol' Twitter comeback
"You may have a point, but you said some stupid shit (that has nothing to do with the current conversation but shh) years ago, therefore invalidating your argument!"
SchAltogether wrote:
The good ol' Twitter comeback
"You may have a point, but you said some stupid shit (that has nothing to do with the current conversation but shh) years ago, therefore invalidating your argument!"
And it's not like I haven't clearly stated controversial opinions that are relevant to the topic
TripleA9000 wrote:
fixed that for you
Quadruple hug.
Did they deadass get suspended in a riff-raff thread, out of all places?
man, society
Griff, Draco, and Individual got suspended?
Some of you janitors are alright, don't come to the forums tommorow.
My respectfulness still extends to the mods, but come on… I don't like seeing everyone getting suspended. Do we really need this much 'protection'? Might take a break of the site for a while and main some other forums for a bit. One week and I feel exhausted.
It's a tuesday midnight, soon to be wednesday morning, don't you guys have friends to be hanging out with?
Honestly while I think the Shortstack gallery and comments being locked is stupid (and if someone who did it thinks shortstacks = loli thats especially retarded) I admit like my comment further back in thread it seemed like it was headed to being one of those galleries where people dump a lot of stuff in it like some past locked galleries that'd probably be better off in a different gallery anyway such as Shortstack Goblins in Monster Girls, Kobolds in Furries, Midna in Legend of Zelda, etc. I know you can put images in multiple relevant galleries if theyre relevant enough for both but constant repeat posts of thick Twili ass or something might be a bit much even with filters.
Also I know Oppai Loli is a thing but even I can differentiate that from a Shortstack since the former is usually a character who was a loli in the first place given big bazongas, OCs and Game CG and the like characters aside.
Edit: Oh I didnt even notice they unlocked gallery posting in it again. So theres that!
So did they suspend draco for complaining that they doxed him?
Lol, the Glgallery got re-opened only to get instalocked.
Coomers btfo again.
Looks like the revolution was successful bois. The comments have been reopened,
I bet those corrupt mods a seething in the discord.
Gallery Locked again but comments open.
What a wild entry Shortstack is. I guess, unless its unlocked, the gallery will always come up a little short.
Trim your nails right this instant.
To whom this is directed to, you know exactly who you are.
Hey mods, guess what.
You will never meet an older shortstack, you will never tease her on a hot summer night, she will never stand on her toes to kiss you, you will never have a roommate who goes to sleep with earplugs to block out your moans, you will never effortlessly pick her up bridal style and throw her on the bed, you will never be nervous about trading in your v-card, she will never lovingly reassure you it's gonna be okay, she will never scratch your stomach in the throes of lust, you will never pull out at the last moment while she insists you do it inside, you will never share postcoital snuggles, you will never skip class the next day and break the bed afterwards. Jannies will never have this.
Go on, lock the comments, lock the gallery, at the end of the day you will continue to shovel shit for a grand total of €0,00. You will continue to empty this digital septic tank, there is nothing you can do to save face now. All of this because your inner faggots couldn't be kept in check.
This gallery is a monument to all your sins, now and forever.
Artichoke wrote:
Trim your nails right this instant.
To whom this is directed to, you know exactly who you are.
Ah shit, thanks for the reminder fam.
I'm ready to be a good boi now.
Artichoke wrote:
Trim your nails right this instant.
To whom this is directed to, you know exactly who you are.
No. :)
Kenetic Kups wrote:
>i on't think centrists exist
-500 iq take
genuine question, what makes someone a right or left winger according to you?
Never see actual centrist in my life, like I never see an actual lefist in the USA.
Has for the difference between Right-wing and left is pretty easy.
One simps the nazi/confederate/yuppie/white supremacist and the left wing Staline/China/Polpot/CHE.
And on this website outside Princessbulbulgum I don't really see anyone else doing the later.
Already a memeber? | Don't have an account? |