Forums / Fun! / Riff-Raff

83,702 total conversations in 7,452 threads

+ New Thread


Rate my riff-raff

Last posted Feb 19, 2015 at 01:42PM EST. Added Feb 19, 2015 at 12:31PM EST
8 posts from 8 users

Twisty wrote:

look, all we are saying is, on a scale:
-there is decent RR threads
-there is shit RR threads
-then there is your (NON) threads
Last edited Feb 19, 2015 at 12:41PM EST

No Original Names has more than just no original names, he has no original ideas. Over the past few days he has been attempting to become a master shitposter by imitating the great threads of old. However, no matter how much he tries to follow the leader, he does not understand that his threads almost always lack the soul of those classics. For example, his recent attempts at a stuck-at-school arc have been all but failures. Compared to the character-based Particle's Mom saga, where actual alternate accounts were used to enhance the flavor, the teacher threads made little attempt at even trying to do this. Its punchline, based on the teacher hijacking the account, fell flat because of its outright ludicrous idea and overall unbelievability.

Recently he seems to have realized people are getting tired of his low-quality shitposts, and has turned to meta humor in an attempt to work his reputation back up. This goes against his intents, however, as this cannot even be called shitposting. Shitposting, by definition, lacks a purpose besides entertainment. This meta thread, however, which asks the reader to criticize other shitposters, leads to a more critical conclusion that goes above pure mindless entertainment. It cannot be called mindless because it requires the poster to think about what others have done, and thinking is most certainly not a mindless task. Because this thread is not mindless, it cannot be shitposting and thus fails at a shitpost.

I give this thread a light 0 out of 10.

This is Peacock Roy, Internet's Busiest Shitpost Nerd.

Last edited Feb 19, 2015 at 12:56PM EST
Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

Old threads normally auto-close after 30 days of inactivity.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

'lo! You must login or signup first!