Forums / Discussion / General

(insert raging cat here)

The gallery? because it’s full of hundreds of pounds worth of tail and ass
The general demographic of Furries? because there’s an inherit sense of sexual deviancy with the furry fandom in general with few exceptions.

probobly because a good half of anthro fans are fans of the porn

We're not safe for industry because our tails get caught in the machines and our loose hair clogs the system.

We're not safe for agriculture because the herbivores eat pesticide-laden crops and die and the foxes kill the chickens.

We're not safe for office work because the cats keep pushing important things off of desks and occasionally rooftops.

That is why furries are not safe for work and also why we're a bunch of sad NEETs.

Are you talking about the entry? It's about a fetish, it falls under the site's NSFW guidelines.

What fandom comprised mostly of adults is not NSFW..? Even the Team Fortress 2 fandom frequently produces stuff that definitely cannot be viewed in a public environment, just not necessarily for sexual content. And do not even get me started with anime.

The janitors will complain about the amount of fur they have to sweep.

I agree. No fandom is safe from Rule 34. Despite the the fact that the majority of the furry fandom are just fans of humanized animals (with no sexual interest), people on the internet tend to emphasize the weirder parts and claim that they’re the norm. It sucks to be labeled as a “dog fucker” when you love animals to the point where you don’t want to see them getting mistreated for someone else’s pleasure. Yeah, someone called me that on Twitter because I admitted that I’m a furry by definition.
I think the reason why the furry fandom gets the worst Rule 34 treatment is because of its focus. Unlike other fandoms, which are focused on works of media like video games and TV shows, the furry fandom is unified by a concept: anthropomorphic animals. Humans have always humanized animals to better understand them or use them as symbols/characters. A concept can be applied to many different things and follow different rules, sexual or not. It’s the flexibility of the “humanized animal” concept that makes it so easy to corrupt.

As a furry myself, I can say that it’s ridiculous why people think the majority of the furry fandom would fuck animals. Although we take inspiration from them, the majority of the fandom knows that that non-human animals are not guaranteed to have the capability of thinking exactly like a human. Most of us don’t love animals to the point of wanting to fuck them – we love them enough to respect the fact that they are different from us. But the internet just loves perversion…

More or less. I can remember seeing one images of various furries saying why they were furry. Two said they were there for the porn, and one said he was there to give them said porn. Also let's not forget, some people are horny enough for some characters like Krystal or that Disney version of Robin Hood.