-
What Is The 'DEIWatchdog' Website And Why Is It Down? The Viral 'Anti-DEI' Video Game Review Site Explained -
What's Up With AI-Generated Memes About A 'Band Of Talented Mice'? The Origin Of The 'Band Of Talented Mice' Song Explained -
What's With Memes About Canada Becoming The '51st State'? The Jokes About Canada Joining The United States Explained -
What's The 'I Bought A Property In Egypt' Meme? The CamEasty Video And 'Chopped Chin' Spin-Off Trend Explained -
What's The 'Eye Of Rah' Meme? The Brainrot Edits Of A Red-Haired Cyclops Explained
+14
TikTok Gets Trolled
Uploaded by Philipp Jun 30, 2022 at 10:04AM EDT
roe v wade tails gets trolled tiktok dance
Origin Entry: 2022 Supreme Court Overturning of Roe v. Wade
File type: jpg
Resolution: (1293px x 988px)
File size: 381 KB
Moar:
+14
2022 Supreme Court Overturning of Roe v. Wade - TikTok Gets Trolled
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![Matt Ford @fordm In a solo concurring opinion, Thomas says the court should reconsider rulings that protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage. Cite as: 597 U. S. (2022) 3 THOMAS, J., concurring 381 U. S. 479 (1965) (right of married persons to obtain con- traceptives)*; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U. S. 558 (2003) (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Oberge- fell v. Hodges, 576 U. S. 644 (2015) (right to same-sex mar- riage), are not at issue. The Court's abortion cases are unique, see ante, at 31-32, 66, 71-72, and no party has asked us to decide "whether our entire Fourteenth Amend- ment jurisprudence must be preserved or revised," McDon- ald, 561 U. S., at 813 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). Thus, I agree that "[n]othing in [the Court's] opinion should be under- stood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abor- tion." Ante, at 66. 19 For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, includ- ing Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any sub- stantive due process decision is "demonstrably erroneous," Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. (2020) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to "correct the error" established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, 587 U. S. (2019) (THOMAS, J., con- curring) (slip op., at 9). After overruling these demonstra- bly erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myr- iad rights that our substantive due process cases have gen- erated. For example, we could consider whether any of the rights announced in this Court's substantive due process cases are "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Amdt. :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/392/454/11f.png "Justice Clarence Thomas Suggests Overturning Gay Marriage")
Image Details
2,216 views (7 from today)
Uploaded Jun 30, 2022 at 10:04AM EDT
Origin Entry
Source
About the Uploader
Philipp
Memesplainer
