-
What's The 'My Shayla' Meme? Tyrese Gibson's Crying Video And The Viral TikTok Sound Explained -
Why Does Donald Trump Want To Change The Gulf Of Mexico’s Name? The 'Gulf Of America' Debate And Memes Explained -
Where Did The 'Raise Your YAYAYA 💜' Meme Come From? The TikTok Trend Explained -
Marvel Rivals Sparks Controversy Over Banned Words, Including 'Winnie-the-Pooh' and 'Free Taiwan' -
Robert Eggers Thanks 'SpongeBob' For Introducing Nosferatu To Zoomers Everywhere
+5
Clinics were bombed to make this possible
Uploaded by BrentD15 Jun 26, 2022 at 08:54AM EDT
roe v. wade terrorism right wing extremism bombings shootings
Origin Entry: 2022 Supreme Court Overturning of Roe v. Wade
File type: png
Resolution: (1439px x 1816px)
File size: 320 KB
More:
+5
2022 Supreme Court Overturning of Roe v. Wade - Clinics were bombed to make this possible
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![Matt Ford @fordm In a solo concurring opinion, Thomas says the court should reconsider rulings that protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage. Cite as: 597 U. S. (2022) 3 THOMAS, J., concurring 381 U. S. 479 (1965) (right of married persons to obtain con- traceptives)*; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U. S. 558 (2003) (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Oberge- fell v. Hodges, 576 U. S. 644 (2015) (right to same-sex mar- riage), are not at issue. The Court's abortion cases are unique, see ante, at 31-32, 66, 71-72, and no party has asked us to decide "whether our entire Fourteenth Amend- ment jurisprudence must be preserved or revised," McDon- ald, 561 U. S., at 813 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). Thus, I agree that "[n]othing in [the Court's] opinion should be under- stood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abor- tion." Ante, at 66. 19 For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, includ- ing Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any sub- stantive due process decision is "demonstrably erroneous," Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. (2020) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to "correct the error" established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, 587 U. S. (2019) (THOMAS, J., con- curring) (slip op., at 9). After overruling these demonstra- bly erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myr- iad rights that our substantive due process cases have gen- erated. For example, we could consider whether any of the rights announced in this Court's substantive due process cases are "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Amdt. :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/392/454/11f.png "Justice Clarence Thomas Suggests Overturning Gay Marriage")
Image Details
1,585 views (4 from today)
Uploaded Jun 26, 2022 at 08:54AM EDT
Origin Entry
About the Uploader
BrentD15
Treasurer & Elocutionist & Media Maid
