Nobody Is As Ready For Pillowy Mounds Of Mashed Potatoes As Uncle Phil
'Thanksgiving Grandma' Plans To Reunite With Mistaken Friend For The 9th Year Since 2016
Blessed By The Gift Of Prophecy, This Headline By 'The Onion' Has Been An Inspiration For Schadenfreude Memes
People Are Joking About How Korean Mahwa 'The Ki Sisters' Is Like 'Baki For Women'
The Slang Term 'Degen' Has Become A Staple Of Meme And Crypto Culture Over The Past Few Years

I have a vested interest to fulfil. Should I.. Pursue a biased. one sided agenda? Dox, send abuse harass or threaten? Create a conflict Make bald claims without evidence? of interest? Such as assuming that giving favours to people within the industry you work for in return for preferential treatment at the cost of impartiality and ethics is perfectly acceptable and moral? Promoting an agenda for one side of a debate whilst completely dismissing or using ad-refusing to enter the hominem attacks on your opponent instead of engaing in debate plus neutral, impartial and unbiased coverage? Suggest say, video games cause real life misogyny whilst Engage in abhorrent and hateful threats, abuse and publishing of personal information about anyone you disagree with in a open arena of debate to have your claims debate? As well as scrunitised and proven with the scientific method whilst disabling comments and ratings? abuse the report abuse function to censor critics of your viewpoint? NO! No you should not I'm glad we had this chat #GamerGate #NotYourShield

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: GamerGate

File type: png

Resolution: (980px x 737px)

File size: 270 KB

NOTHING HAS F------ CHANGED 10

Gamergate (harassment campaign) Article Talk From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Gamergate (disambiguation). Gamergate or GamerGate (GG)[¹] was a loosely organized misogynistic online harassment campaign and a right-wing backlash against feminism, diversity, and progressivism in video game culture. [2][³] It was conducted using the hashtag "#Gamergate" primarily in 2014 and 2015.[1][4][5][6] Beginning in August 2014, Gamergate targeted women in the video game industry, most notably feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian and video game developers Zoë Quinn and Brianna Wu, among others.[7][8][9][10][11] The harassment campaign included doxing, r--- threats, and death threats.[12][13][14] Gamergate proponents ("Gamergaters") stated that they were a social movement, but lacked well-defined goals, a coherent message, and leaders, making Gamergate difficult to define.[15][16][17] Gamergaters claimed to promote ethics in video games journalism, claimed to be protecting the "gamer" identity, and opposed what they asserted as "political correctness" in video games.[18][19][20][21][22] Read Date Target Gamergate, online harassment campaign in 2014-15 that targeted women in the video game industry. The attacks were attributed largely to white male right-wing gamers who railed against the rise and influence of women and feminism in the industry. Gamergate served as a recruiting tool for the growing alt-right movement and helped spur the online “Pizzagate" conspiracy theory, which soon spawned the wider QAnon conspiracy movement. …………………………....…..……….…..... Attack type Victims Motive View source Inquiry XA 28 languages ✓ Perpetrators Internet trolls, particularly from 4chan, Internet Relay Chat, and 8chan View history Tools ✓ Gamergate August 2014 - 2015 Women in the video game industry See all media Online harassment campaign Zoë Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and others Gamergaters created conspiracy theories falsely accusing Quinn of an unethical relationship with video game journalist Nathan Grayson.[23][24][25] More broadly, they alleged unethical collusion between the press and feminists, progressives, and social critics.[17][26] [27] These claims were widely dismissed as trivial, conspiracy theories, baseless, or unrelated to actual issues of ethics in gaming and journalism.[28] [29][30] Gamergate supporters frequently denied that the harassment took place, falsely claiming it to be manufactured by the victims.[31][32] Misogyny anti-feminism anti- progressivism FBI investigation Gamergate has been described as a culture war over cultural diversification, artistic recognition, feminism in video games, social criticism in video games, and the social identity of gamers.[28][33] [34] [35] Many supporters of Gamergate opposed the increasing influence of feminism and so-called "social justice warriors" on video game culture. [2][36] Gamergate led figures both inside and outside the gaming industry to focus on methods of addressing online harassment, ways to minimize harm, and prevent similar events. [37] [38] [39] [40] Gamergate has been viewed as a contributor to the alt-right and other right- wing movements.[21][41] Video game developer Brianna Wu

Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26

View All 4,079 Images

Load 3 Comments

More:

+31

GamerGate - Image #849,585

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

I have a vested interest to fulfil. Should I.. Pursue a biased. one sided agenda? Dox, send abuse harass or threaten? Create a conflict Make bald claims without evidence? of interest? Such as assuming that giving favours to people within the industry you work for in return for preferential treatment at the cost of impartiality and ethics is perfectly acceptable and moral? Promoting an agenda for one side of a debate whilst completely dismissing or using ad-refusing to enter the hominem attacks on your opponent instead of engaing in debate plus neutral, impartial and unbiased coverage? Suggest say, video games cause real life misogyny whilst Engage in abhorrent and hateful threats, abuse and publishing of personal information about anyone you disagree with in a open arena of debate to have your claims debate? As well as scrunitised and proven with the scientific method whilst disabling comments and ratings? abuse the report abuse function to censor critics of your viewpoint? NO! No you should not I'm glad we had this chat #GamerGate #NotYourShield

View Gallery Random Image