Anons explain the artsy fartsy trend

$In "N Out Chef 10/05/14 (Sun) 170021 ID 51262b No 55633 227 File thidi 14125536212434 (74 #4 KB. 494x600·83 100. 1404538427016 my two c research on the actual effects of media on artistic or masterful films changing the way we, as a society, think about certain topics The big idea behind the anti-GG crowds behavior is that they think oriented and create some sort of map to the gaming interactivity of games allows it to more effectively communicate certain things which will go on to and c The problem I see with that is even the best movies in human history never seem to have as much of an effect on society as others Many scholarly film critics will stick by the assertion that Citizen Kane and Stanley Kubrick's works are monumental in slm-making. but Star Wars seems to be the only film in the last 30 years that seems to have had any kind of impact on society It's easily proven that violent and sexual media doesn't create violent and sexual ally, we are a species However, if the anti-GG crowd is going to wave around some of the most pisspoor academic" research saying that games not being rad-fem friendly enough is a huge good to that was only miniscule fraction of the total gaming audience will have no afect on the industry just because critics celebrate it, any more than some arthouse sundance movie is going to change the world because some critics raved over it In 'N Out Chef 10/05/14 (Sun) 17:13:47 ID: 44a8cb No.55678 쯔25741 zzasm I want to agree but ofer an additional opinion Orson Wells and Stanley Kubrick were professional film-makers. They were technically proficient in their craft. They both invented countless cinematography techniques that are still in use today. Whether or not you like their film, they were truly technical masters of the craft of film making. The anti-GG crowd are blinded by hipsterism. They think someone with a cuitural studies degree (and no technical skills) can jump in and make games with the best of them. This simply isn't true. Games are at least as technical a craft, if not more so than film-making. But the result of this studies degreel why dont people think my games are goodi) is blaming the failings on In "N Out Chef 10/05/14 (Sun) 17:3046 ID: 51262b No.55741 247122 You're not wrong. I didn't mean to imply that they weren't important for their contributions to the craft, but as far as the rest of the world goes.. Well, they remember that Rosebud line and they remember the silly outits the Droogs wore. Cultural icons they may be, but their actual messages and complex themes are forgotten or Wells and Kubrick's contibutions to the art of film making could be compared to Corrinne Yu's contributions to Direct3D and DirectX leading to gaming developing the way it did. Hugely important, but society and the audience at large may only know them acknowledge the few people you everything about modern media to. In 'N Out Chef 10/05/14 (Sun) 17:51:38 ID: 024358 No 55808 255678 >The anti-GG crowd are blinded by hipsterism. They think someone with a cultural studies degree (and no technical skills) can jump in and make games with the best of them. This simply isn't true. Games are at least as technical a craft, if not more so, than film-making. But the result of this cognitive dissonance (I'm a hipster with a cultural studies degree! why don't people think my games are good?l) is blaming the falings on mis sogyny I always make a point to echo this whenever someone says it. The PC police don't give you art, they give you Captain Planet. Never buy the b------- that the people who want s on f------ Shakespeare are t In 'N Out Chef 1006/14 (Mon) 00.03.19 ID ac031e No 57122 Sometimes themes, humor and morals get lost over time and between different cultures Its why I get kind of fussy about people worrying more about getting across a lesson or a theme over having a good, internally consistent story that is technically proficient. If you f--- up the execution, no one will want to read/play/watch your story People will read into your stories and see themes that you might not have intended, or might be the complete opposite of what you had in mind. You cant stop someone from making that kind of conclusion without outright saying it or bashing it over people's If you do the first, then someone will come in and say that you, the creator, are wrong about your own work and intentions in writing it, and if you do the second then you cheapen t This is a glimpse into the cultural angle surrounding GamerGate. A few well spoken Anons weigh in with an eloquence we don't often see reblogged from image board culture These are screenshots from a riveting thread going on at 8chan right now in regards to Academia regulating cultural expression. Since the destination of everything on 8chan is the aether I thought I'd save it and share it. The speculation Peach Anon has about the intrusion of Academia by what they call "radfem" comes from the fact that the 14 "gamers are dead" articles cite feminist academic work discussing hegemony (yeah I had to look it up too) in Gaming culture. The reality is the Academic who came up with the notion probably didn't intend for it to be used the way it was when it was. But it sparked some interesting post-mortems, Like, can and should academics regulate culture, if so is journalism an appropriate weapon to deliver the researched paper, Will we reach the same problem we have with pharmaceutical research that sometimes is vaguely aimed at selling a Before I conclude with my two cents l'd like to state that I don't agree with everything above, but the salient sentiment about how we shouldn't regulate art and story telling for the greater morality of society is one that I do side with as an advocate of free expression. As someone who's internet life is on the cultural "boundary", it has been eye opening watching both sides of the isle duke it out ideologically. And how apparent it is from reading all this, that video games simply are a dressing to a much wider discussion. One that our generation has needed to have for a tew years. Like a location in Street Fighter, video games are just the backdrop The idea that nobody really understands Clockwork Orange or Citizen Kane but the work of Kubrick and Wells are what we thank for modern film making is an interesting one. Much like Corrinne Yu is a woman nobody knows, but without her Halo wouldn't be possible. The argument then boils down to something like,-like video games, most art isjust piss in the wind " This might be true, but each drop is a donation into the pool of ideas To use Depression Quest as an example of a game that will probably be forgotten in a few months, and one that might actually not be a fair representation of all the realities of Depression, it does play with some interesting concepts. Mainly, the one Visual Novel fans and developers have been trying to get across for years: you can experience someone else's life interactively. Not new for some. But for those of us who aren't really into Japanese stuff, maybe it can serve as a jumping off point for a more ambitious It's these sparks I think, that artists can take with them to create things organically through their own agency. Academic circles may raise valid questions about the AAA popcorn-flick side of video games, but like lifelong gamers have learned the nuance is buried in the little pieces and the little Using Japanese games and Western games as an example of where very different cultures are sharing ideas with each other through video games peacefully and constructively, so too l think can other schools of thought academic, ideological, identity politics, or otherwise. Rather than fighting over a ca n share it and possibly bake new ones together. And we wont get anywhere without some allowance for free discussion #academia #artistic expression Hgame notes$