Why Are Sonic Fans Warning Moviegoers Not To Cheer When Maria Dies In 'Sonic The Hedgehog 3?' The Viral Memes Explained
What Is The 'Sharon's Burnt Marie Callender Pie' Meme? The Thanksgiving Burned Pie Meme Explained
Is Chis-Chan Having A Kid And Who Is 'Flutter?' The Rumor About The Lolcow's Potential Child Explained
What Does 'Ningning Is The Maknae' Mean? The Viral Memes About The 'Aespa' K-Pop Idol Explained
What Is The '2006 Volleyball Incident' And Is It Real? The Viral Conspiracy Theory Explained

BAIT 102: LOW-QUALITY BAIT TFYC doesn't care about women > There's no censorship going on >Let's talk about Literally Who/Literally Who 2 >Games need to include people of all kinds and you're Something-ist if you don't agree >News says you're misogynists so you must be >Internalized misogyny/racism/homophobia > "Gamers are dead" is fine because it's opinion > People still opposing GG even after tons of explanation >But what about me? Look at me! >OMG harassment! >Hypocrites justitying hypocrisy USE'IGNORE', IT'S SUPER EFFECTIVE

Share Pin Download More

advice trolling gamergate

Origin Entry: GamerGate

Notes:

Original Source: https://twitter.com/Greatbear21/status/516357883530080256/photo/1

File type: png

Resolution: (525px x 747px)

File size: 170 KB

NOTHING HAS F------ CHANGED 10

Gamergate (harassment campaign) Article Talk From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Gamergate (disambiguation). Gamergate or GamerGate (GG)[¹] was a loosely organized misogynistic online harassment campaign and a right-wing backlash against feminism, diversity, and progressivism in video game culture. [2][³] It was conducted using the hashtag "#Gamergate" primarily in 2014 and 2015.[1][4][5][6] Beginning in August 2014, Gamergate targeted women in the video game industry, most notably feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian and video game developers Zoë Quinn and Brianna Wu, among others.[7][8][9][10][11] The harassment campaign included doxing, r--- threats, and death threats.[12][13][14] Gamergate proponents ("Gamergaters") stated that they were a social movement, but lacked well-defined goals, a coherent message, and leaders, making Gamergate difficult to define.[15][16][17] Gamergaters claimed to promote ethics in video games journalism, claimed to be protecting the "gamer" identity, and opposed what they asserted as "political correctness" in video games.[18][19][20][21][22] Read Date Target Gamergate, online harassment campaign in 2014-15 that targeted women in the video game industry. The attacks were attributed largely to white male right-wing gamers who railed against the rise and influence of women and feminism in the industry. Gamergate served as a recruiting tool for the growing alt-right movement and helped spur the online “Pizzagate" conspiracy theory, which soon spawned the wider QAnon conspiracy movement. …………………………....…..……….…..... Attack type Victims Motive View source Inquiry XA 28 languages ✓ Perpetrators Internet trolls, particularly from 4chan, Internet Relay Chat, and 8chan View history Tools ✓ Gamergate August 2014 - 2015 Women in the video game industry See all media Online harassment campaign Zoë Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and others Gamergaters created conspiracy theories falsely accusing Quinn of an unethical relationship with video game journalist Nathan Grayson.[23][24][25] More broadly, they alleged unethical collusion between the press and feminists, progressives, and social critics.[17][26] [27] These claims were widely dismissed as trivial, conspiracy theories, baseless, or unrelated to actual issues of ethics in gaming and journalism.[28] [29][30] Gamergate supporters frequently denied that the harassment took place, falsely claiming it to be manufactured by the victims.[31][32] Misogyny anti-feminism anti- progressivism FBI investigation Gamergate has been described as a culture war over cultural diversification, artistic recognition, feminism in video games, social criticism in video games, and the social identity of gamers.[28][33] [34] [35] Many supporters of Gamergate opposed the increasing influence of feminism and so-called "social justice warriors" on video game culture. [2][36] Gamergate led figures both inside and outside the gaming industry to focus on methods of addressing online harassment, ways to minimize harm, and prevent similar events. [37] [38] [39] [40] Gamergate has been viewed as a contributor to the alt-right and other right- wing movements.[21][41] Video game developer Brianna Wu

Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26

View All 4,079 Images

Moar:

How to review a game properly

The Purpose Of A Game Review and How To Write One With Minimal Subjectivity In the continuing consumer revolt that is #gamergate, more than once has the subject of game reviews come up. Qualms are usually focused around how they are frequently slanted, skewed, heavily biased, or just not informative. So I've decided to sit down and tell you how to go about crafting a quality review Why do we write reviews? Any review boiled down into its basic form is written in order to help the reader (YOUR customer) make an informed decision about what they MIGHT purchase, or otherwise utilize. The fact of the matter is this; game journalism and game reviews are a customer oriented business. Your readers are your customers, except rather than paying you upfront with cash (unless you're still subscribing to a magazine), they're paying you with clicks of your articles. Nevertheless your ultimate job is to serve your customer and serve them well. Assume that every customer has a limited entertainment budget; your job is to make sure that they are getting the best value for their dollar Over the past week I've seen more than a few people make the mostly false claim that a review can't be objective in its nature. Not only do I disagree with that, I tend to make it a point in the reviews that I write to avoid unnecessarily interjecting my opinion into it as much as reasonably possible. A good written review is more or less an informative essay that is flavored with your unique personality with a sprinkling of your personal interpretation. To build the structure of a good review, I go back to the 4E's: Educate, Explain, Elaborate, Emphasize. Let's go ahead and take a look at each of those in detail. Educate: Explain to the customer WHAT they are buying Follow the What, Who, When, Where (the 4 W's) method. WHAT game are you reviewing? WHO developed and published it? WHEN did it, or does it, release? WHERE (which platforms) did it, or will it, release? Explain After you've covered the basic facts sheet, in this section of the review is where you talk about exactly what the game is. What do you do in the game? What is the purpose of it? Are there additional under explained or not explained features (not shown on the box or in pre-release material)? How much entertainment time should the average customer get out of this title? What genre is it? How much time did you spend with the product? There are more questions to be asked depending on the product, but this should give you the general idea of what this section is about Elaborate: In this section is where you go into further necessary detail on features in the game that are big enough topics to not easily fit into basic explanation. What is the big hook for the game that sets it apart from others of its genre? Does the game do something that no one else has done? This is its own section because you may need to go into complex detail to explain mechanic in-depth, unique title features, etc. Emphasize: In this section of the review is where you should put more detail on quality of life and quality of build. Ifit's a current gen title with achievements (such as Steam Achievements, Xbox Achievements, PlayStation Trophies, etc) you would talk about them here. Does the game run at industry standard resolutions? Are there additional microtransactions? Will DLC be available? Are there big, notable issues such as bugs, screen-tearing, poor performance, crashes, so on and so forth? You will often hear people say "How are the graphics?" Interpretation of artistic STYLE is subjective; QUALITY of work isn't as much as you'd think. Are the textures washed out and muddy? Is it difficult to see properly? Are there clear and obvious typos? Is the audio for the game clear and free of background noise (yes, this kind of stuf DOES happen)? You should talk about all of these things here. Closin The final portion of your review should talk about your own experience with the itle and how you enjoyed it, if at all. THIS is where the subjectivity of rour review comes into play, as opposed to the other sections. Every person is unique and will consume the content differently. You can talk about how much fin that you had, or whether your disliked the experience overall. What were your impressions? What did you think of the art style and direction? How does it compare to other games of its genre, in your view? Does it do things worse than its competitors or better in our view? How did you enjoy the story, if applicable? Again, there is plenty of space here for you to show the reader YOUR interpretation of the facts presented in the majority of the product review. I typically avoid providing scores on my reviews. The reason being that no one can seem to actually agree on WHAT scale to use. People use stars, yes no, scale of 1 to 5 and scale of 1 to 1o, usually. My general problem with these scoring systems is that the meaning of them can vary wildly depending on who is looking at it. A 3 star review is 'supposed' to be average, but to many people it's considered mediocre and not worth your time. Instead, I say who is likely to purchase the title and who is likely to avoid the title. If, for example, the game falls into the 'brawler genre and you didn't have a bad experience with it, you can safely say that "Fans of brawlers will probably enjoy this title." This achieves two final goals: It defines who the intended audience of the title was, and who would do better to avoid it altogether Now bear in mind, this isn't necessarily a blocked-out template for every review; it's here to explain to you WHAT should be talked about in a review why you're talking about it, and how to do so well. Your job, as a reviewer, isn't to tell the customer what to buy. Your job is to INFORM the customer of what they COULD buy, should they be inclined to. You are their eyes and ears in places that they cannot venture, you are there to provide them with the data that they could not easily glean on their own. Happy reviewing Oliver Campbell Follow author Share

Pin

One Angry Gamer Article By William "Billy D" Usher. Dated September 27, 2014

#GAMERGATE: KOTAKU. NERD-SHAMING AND BEN KUCHERA piee over on thor tine'spoinful The right is dorLandfuarterrors. you e s oo damned short for the concest of aulty o Penny Acace that circalated early on topet the I SUPPORT #GAMERGATE CONDEMN SU.PPORT WOMEN AM AGAINST ASED AND CORRUPT GAME JOURNALISM uily incomect but no by the people whoare What happesed during this

Pin

One Angry Gamer Article By William "Billy D" Usher. Dated September 27, 2014

Pin

Image #838,825

ISTE DO NOT QUESTION

Pin

The Purpose Of A Game Review And How To Write One With Minimal Subjectivity By Oliver Campbell

ver Capbell onSep25 The Purpose Of A Game Review and How To Write One With Minimal Subjectivity In the continuing consum er revolt that is #gamergate, more than once has the subject of game reviews come up. Qualms are usually focused around how they are frequently slanted, skewed, heavily biased, or just not informative. So I've decided to sit down and tell you how to go about crafting il quality review. Why do we write reviews? Any review boiled down into its basic form is written in order to help the reader (YOUR customer) make an informed decision about what they MIGHT purchase, or otherwise utilize. The fact of the matter is this; game journalism and game reviews are a customer oriented business. Your readers are your customers, except rather than paying you upfront with cash (unless you're still subscribing to a magazine) they're paying you with clicks of your articles. Nevertheless, your ultimate job is to serve your customer and serve them well. Assume that every customer has a limited entertainment budget: your job is to make sure that they are getting the best value for their dollar Over the past week I've seen more than a few people make the mostly false claim that a review can't be objective in its nature. Not only do I disagree with that, I tend to make it a point in the reviews that I write to avoid unnecessarily interjecting my opinion into it as much as reasonably possible. A good written review is more or less an informative essay that is flavored with your unique personality with a sprinkling of your personal interpretation. To build the structure of a good review, I go back to the 4E's: Educate, Explain, Elaborate, Emphasize. Let's go ahead and take a look at each of those in detail. Educate Explain to the customer WHAT they are buying. Follow the What, Who, When, Where (the 4 W's) method. WHAT game are yow reviewing? WHO developed and published it? WHEN did it,or does it,ese WHEREwhich platforms) did it, or will it, release Explain After you've covered the basic fucts sheet, in this section of the review is where yo talk about emctly what the game is, What do you do in the game? What is the purpose of it? Are there aaditional under explained or not explained features (not shown on the box or in pre-release material)? How euch entertainment time should the average customer get out of this tirle? What genre is it? How much time did you spend with the product? There are more questions to be asked depending on the product, but this shod give you the general idea of what this section is about. Elaborate In this section is where you go into further necessary detail on featares in the game that are big enongh topics to not eusily fit into basic explanation. What is the big hook for the game that sets it apart from others of its genre? Does the game do something that no one else has done? This is its own section becanse yon may need to go into complex detafl to explain a mechanic in-depth, meique title features, ete In this section of the review is where you shouid put more dctail on quality oflife and quality of build. If it's a eent gen title with achievements (such as Steam Achievements, Xbox Achievements, PlayStation Trophies, etc) you wonld taik about them here. Does the game run at industry standard resolutions? Are there additional microtnansactions Will DLC be availabie? Are there big, notable issues such as bugs, screen-tearing, poor performance,cnashes, so on and so fortk? You will often hear people say "How are the graphics? Interpretation of artistic STYLE is suhjective QUALITY ofwork it as much as you'd think. Are the textures wushed out and muddy? Is it difieralt to see properiy? Are there clear and obvions typos? Is the audio for the game clear and free of baciground noise es, this kind of stuf DOES happen)? You should talk abot all ofthese things here Closing The final portion of your review should talk about your own eoperience with the titie and how you enjoyed it, ifat al. THIS is wbere the subjectivity of your review comes into play, as opposed to the other sections. Every person consume the content differently. Yow can talk about how much ficn that you had or whether your disliked the eoxperience overall. What were your impressions? What did you think of the art style and direction? How does it compare to other games of its genre, in your view? Does it do things worse than its competitors or better in your view? How did you enjoy the story, if applicable? Again, there is plenty of space here for you to show the reader YOUR interpretation of the facts preseuted in the majority af the product review is sunique and wil I typically avoid providing scores on my reviews. The reason being that no one can seem to actually agree on WHAT scale to use. People use stars, yes no, scale of to s and scale of i to o, usually. My general problem with these scoring systems is that the meanin名of them can vary wildly depending on who is looking at it. A 3 star review is 'supposed' to be average, but to many people it's considered mediocre and not worth your time. Instead, I say who is likely to purchase the title and who is likely to avoid the title. If, for example, the game falls into the 'brawler genre and you didn't have a bad experience with it, you can safely say that "Fans of brawlers will probably enjoy this title." This achieves two final goals: It defines who the intended audience of the title was, and who would do better to avoid it altogether. Now bear in mind, this isn't necessarily a blocked-out template for every review, it's here to explain to you WHAT should be talked about in review, why you're talking about it, and how to do so well. Your job, as a reviewer isn't to tell the customer what to buy. Your job is to INFORM the customer of what they COULD buy, should they be inclined to. You are their eyes and ears in places that they cannot venture, you are there to provide them with the data that they could not easily glean on their own. Happy reviewing. Oliver Campbell nter ema Responses Inspired to write your own story? TRAIN PEOPLE The paradoxes of organization of PEORE of agity

Pin

Tyrion Lannister

When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say Tyrion Lannister Game of Thrones Frank Decapio @FrankDecapio 36m With regards to the anti-#GamerGate censorship pic.twitter.com/J5NLMKBPqx Reply t3 Retweet * Favorite

Pin

Image #838,795

Do you feel like GG is slowly leaning to simply promoting figureheads (such as yourself no offence) while backing off from actually having their own voices in the debate? Listen I understand the arguments from both sides in reference to some sort of leadership but here is thee reality 1) Leadership can work if you have a great leader but only if you have a great leader. They have to be on point at all times, they have to be eloquent, they have to be a great orator, a great organizer, and a host of other things. If they fail at any of these they kill what they try to promote. The greatest danger to any cause is the person who promotes it most. They become a target and their foibles and faults become those of the group they represent. 2) Groups have fallen apart without good leadership. Look at OWS, look at Chanology. You either have a complete absence of someone in charge or those that gain power, through their own character faults, hurt those they try and lead 3) GamerGate or whatever you want to refer to it as is different though. It's not a real world protest, it requires no physical action. You have no marches to organize, no protests to gather, no parks to camp in. It works as a decentralized consumer movement because it doesn't require the logistical support that a real world movement would 4) People are falling for a very simple ploy that has killed a lot of good ideas in the past. The idea is that to win the day they need to appeal to the middle/moderates/independents/uniformed and to do so they need structure and a refined message. This is false. What happens is that you go so far to the middle from your original position to sway those residing there that you are no longer distinguishable from those you are trying to convince; your message becomes diluted and loses meaning People are being suckered into fighting this on the terms the other side dictates, Behave a certain way, do PR a certain way, promote a message a certain way. But you see the other side is losing so why adopt thei tactics? People should continue to do what they think works, whoever wants to voice an opinion let them and if it has merit it will be adopted and if it does not it will be ignored. There are no leaders, simply envoys carrying the message of the whole about 4 hours ago 1 person likes this

Pin

Image #838,794

GamerGate Part 1: The Path We've Taken [InternetAristocrat] o en r 、 submitted 8 hours ago by give-me-sugar [H] [N] 280 comments share save hide give gold report nsfw flair reports: 1 spam remove reapprove ignore reports (youtu.be 540 Gamerate - user reports: 3: spam 1: contributing part of ongoing harassment and doxxing campaign 1: Ban this garbage 1: vote manipulation

Pin

Give it up for the neutral internet encyclopedia, everybody!

Nobody cares what the pro-GG crowd (which to be honest if one is saying they are po GG" then they are in effect pro sexual harassment thinks or feels in this situation their point-of-view is decidedly fringe. The sooner you and a few others get over the misunderstanding that "pro-GG" is an equal-weight opinion alongside what this is actually about, the better. Tarc (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC) Connecting... (cur) difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m-minor edit, → section edit, ← (newest I oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (201501 100 | 250 1500) automatic edit summary Compare selected revisions cur prev) ⓔ 1948, 28 September 2014 Cuchu an talk contribs) m (49824 bytes) (0 Changed protection ever f Gamerga e controversy Edi romy administrators] (expires 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) [Move Allow only administrators] (expires 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)) cur prev . ○ 1946, 28 September 2014 Cuchullan talk contribs) m 49,824 bytes) (0 Changed protection level of Game gate controversy: Edit warring content dispute ([Edit Allow only administrators] (expires 18:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)) Move Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) (cur I prev) O 19:27,28 September 2014 Tar (talk I contribs) .(49,824 bytes) (1,076) (Undid revision 627446884 by Masem (talk) -not a chance that any of that private mailing list nuttery is going to be her,e in any form) . (cur I prev) 18:54, 28 September 2014 Masem (talk | contribs) .(50,900 bytes) (+1,076). . (Undid revision 627444078 by TheRedPenorDoom (talk) this is actually reasonable to include (it's not fringe), but it needs to be written to be a separate concept as I have done) . (cur | prev) O O 18:30, 28 September 2014 TheRedPenofDoom (talk | contribs) . (49,824 bytes) (-984). (Undid revision 627443919 by Bosstopher (talk) undue weight to fringe conspiracy theorist) (cur | prev) O O 18:29, 28 September 2014 Bosstopher (talk | contribs) (50,808 bytes) (+984) (Undid revision 627441233 by NorthBy SouthBaranof (talk) You seem to have reverted based off of a misreading of the sources used. Please look at the Orland source . (cur | prev) O O 18:06, 28 September 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs). (49,824 bytes) (-984) (We don't really care what someone from Breitbart said. We just don't) (cur I prev)O 17:55, 28 September 2014 Diego Moya (talk | contribs) m (50,808 bytes) (+984). (Reverted edits by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) to last version by Diego Moya) (Tag: HHVM) (cur | . (cur r(cur prev) O 17:55, 28 September 2014 prev)。 17:48. 28 September 2014 prev) O O 17:47 28 September 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs) (49,824 bytes) (-984) (Breitbart garbage has no place in this article) Diego Moya (talk contribs) m (50808 bytes) (+3) ( Soc a media campagn and backlash clam (Tag: HHV Diego Moya (talk contribs) (50,805 bytes) (+62) (+Social media campaign and backlash this is at Forbes too Tag:

Pin

Alexander again

Leigh Alexander @leighalexander Follow @melissagira @calebhannan congrats dude, your lethal absence of ethics will be the defining moment of the rest of your career わReply Retweet ★ Favorite More RETWEETS FAVORITES 17 4:13 PM-17 Jan 2014

Pin

Stephen's Conversation On The Middle Ground Fallacy.

Stephen @greyinkling Follow As predicted we are getting a number of false middle of the road criticisms about #GamerGate saying we're going in the wrong direction わReply t Retweet * Favorite More RETWEE TS FAVORITES 8 2:14 PM- 28 Sep 2014 Smug Anime Girl @mylittlepwnies3 53m @greyinkling It's really amazing how transparent it is Stephen @greyinkling 52m @mylittlepwnies3 What amazes me is how timely it is. Just like the sympathy trolling last week. Exactly as predicted weeks in advance Jackie Brown @GOBBBluth 51m @greyinkling "Middle Ground" fallacy users are the absolute worst. #GamerGate Smug Anime Girl mylittlepwnies3-51m @greyinkling "Anonymous" really does have an amazing ability to detect shills Chaz Davis @ChazDM 48m @greyinkling I missed some of that, give me some examples please #GamerGate Stephen @greyinkling 44m @ChazDM As soon as I speak up I can't find the tweets that made me write that. I'm referring to people complaining about politics' for one Chaz Davis @ChazDM 43m @grevinkling what politics? is anyone on #GamerGate talking about the debt ceiling or some s--- like that? Stephen @greyinkling 42m @ChazDM Insisting tweets that say we're talking about politics now, and never should have been. Even when we aren't talking about it at all Stephen @greyinkling 41m @ChazDM Oh no, not like that. People saying GG has become 'about politics This following a few days of the usual trolls complaining Chaz Davis @ChazDM 41m @greyinkling just another flavor of "stop talking about zoe quinn" when nobody was talking about her Stephen @greyinkling 40m @ChazDM .about us "only talking about SJWs and not journalism". One example still. Just keep an open ear for it. Stephen @greyinkling 40m @ChazDM Pretty much. It's like when there was a push for us to make a list of demands. Trolls have been doing this in a smaller form as well Stephen @greyinkling 39m @ChazDM asking us to specify EXACTLY to the letter what we are standing for so they can then find a hole to poke and argue semantics Chaz Davis @ChazDM·39m @greyinkling Yeah the whole list of demands was not a good idea from the start, good thing vanguard opposed it and I agreed with him Stephen @greyinkling 38m @ChazDM It was another thing that many predicted, because this is the most predictable trolling I have ever seen on such a grand scale

Pin

DoctorWatkin's Response To Leigh Alexander.

Doc @DoctorWatkins Follow silly kids, i AM #GamerGate pic.twitter.com/BWvysZsO7F Reply t Retweet * Favorite More Leigh Alexander (a leigha!exander silly kids. i AM game journalisnm 7:23am-4 Sep 14 2:20 PM -28 Sep 2014

Pin

+18

GamerGate - If you're falling for bait, at least fall for high quality bait.

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

BAIT 102: LOW-QUALITY BAIT TFYC doesn't care about women > There's no censorship going on >Let's talk about Literally Who/Literally Who 2 >Games need to include people of all kinds and you're Something-ist if you don't agree >News says you're misogynists so you must be >Internalized misogyny/racism/homophobia > "Gamers are dead" is fine because it's opinion > People still opposing GG even after tons of explanation >But what about me? Look at me! >OMG harassment! >Hypocrites justitying hypocrisy USE'IGNORE', IT'S SUPER EFFECTIVE

View Gallery Random Image

Image Details

601 views (20 from today)

Uploaded Sep 28, 2014 at 09:14PM EDT

Origin Entry

Notes

Original Source: https://twitter.com/Greatbear21/status/516357883530080256/photo/1

click to expand

Tags

Claim Authorship Edit History

About the Uploader

AsexualInnuendo

Scrapbooker & Pundit

Textile Embed

!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/838/862/401.png!

Today's Top Image Galleries

Queen Never Cry meme.

Queen Never Cry

Wifejak meme format depicting a female wojak character with red hair and a grey shirt.

Wifejak

The Social Contract

The Social Contract

My New Character meme.

My New Character / Chill Guy