Patterson-Gimlin footage analysis | Cryptid | Know Your Meme

Where Do Scientists and Professionals Stand on the Patterson-Gimlin Film? Youtube: Truth is Scarier than Fiction For decades the 1967 Patterson-Gimlin footage, allegedly showing a bigfoot dubbed "Patty", has caused debate over its authenticity. This graphic contains arguments from professionals on both sides. Pro Grover Krantz- Anthropologist Was skeptical at first, but believed that the odd gait and what he perceived as flexing leg muscles showed the film to be genuine. Dale Sheets and Universal technicians, worked in the special effects industry They believed Patty could be. recreated, however doing so would be almost impossible. Others thought it would be extremely expensive. Ken Peterson and Disney animators, worked in the special effects industry When shown the film, Ken said that Disney technicians would not be able to recreate it. Some animators couldn't believe it was shot in the wild and not a studio. Donald W. Grieve- Biomechanics expert Believed that Patty's movements seemed natural and would be difficult to fake. Said the shoulders were too wide and that a human couldn't recreate the gait. Jeff Meldrum- Anthropologist Believed that Patty was too advanced for the costumes at the time. Also believed that the track Patty left behind was genuine due to a midtarsal break found in it. Skeptical Bernard Heuvelmans- Founder of cryptozoology, zoologist Believed Patty's hair to be too uniform, thought the chest was too hairy, and thought that Patty was too calm. Still believed in Bigfoot. John Napier- Primatologist, paleoanthropologist Believed Patty's footprints didn't match up with it's height, thought that the footprint's "hourglass shape" was suspicious. Esteban Sarmiento- Primatologist, biologist Believed Patty's foot was too light and didn't match the dark palms of the hands. Also thought the body proportions matched a human rather than an ape. David Daegling, Daniel Schmitt- Anthropologists While they believe the costume to be high quality, they contend that the poor image quality points to a hoax. Also believe that the gait. could be recreated by humans. Stan Winston- Special effects supervisor, makeup artist Believed that Patty was a poor quality suit. Said that it could be recreated in a day for between a few hundred to a thousand dollars. Peter Byrne- Big game hunter, outdoorsman, wildlife photographer Thought the location of the film made it genuine, as it was near camping roads where people could have seen the hoaxer. Also thought that Patterson wasn't capable of pulling a hoax off. Richard Freeman- Cryptozoologist, zookeeper Believed that Patty being a female adds to the authenticity, as it would be harder to hoax. Also thinks that anatomical details like the brow ridge and body proportions don't match a human. Bill Munns- Special effects and makeup artist, cameraman, film editor Believed that the skull and muscles of Patty showed a genuine bigfoot and were too complex to be fake. Also did a computer analysis of the film which he believed showed that Patty was real. Darren Naish- Paleontologist, zoologist Thought that Patterson's background in craftsmanship and promoting bigfoot was suspicious. Also noted shared details between Patterson's film and the 1955 William Roe encounter that suggest Patterson based the film off of it. Chris Murphy and Cliff Crook- former bigfoot researchers After a 1999 analysis of the film, they claimed that a buckle could be seen in the film that showed that Patty was a man in a suit. Rick Baker- Special effects and makeup artist, creator of Harry from "Harry and the Hendersons" Looked through the film frame by frame with costumed ape actor Bob Burns and concluded that it was a man in a costume. Said that Patty looked like cheap fake fur.

Share Pin Download More

cryptozoology patterson gimlin footage bigfoot sasquatch analysis video monster creepy

Origin Entry: Cryptid

File type: jpg

Resolution: (759px x 2048px)

File size: 401 KB

Europeans With Cryptids What whimsical creatures! Let's invite them in for tea! Oui! Thankyou! We'd love some tea! Let us celebrate! Americans With Cryptids This is the last forest you're haunting you sonovabitch Lmao, I'm gonna f*ck your corpse when I'm done. Bremmies with Cryptids I'll suck your d--- Deal! if you suck mine.

10 "I SAW YOU SURROUNDED BY THRONGS OF GREAT BEASTS THAT SOAR AND SWIM AND SLITHER...) "...YET PALE IN CONTRAST TO YOUR OWN UNEQUALED HORROR.) "I SAW YOU REVELING ON THE THRESHOLD OF ARMAGEDDON, DRAWING BRIMSTONE DOWN FROM THE COSMOS AND LEVIATHANS UP FROM THE DEPTHS.) ("BUT ULTIMATELY... I SAW THAT YOU WERE VERY MUCH ALONE.) "I WILL PRAY FOR YOU, AND PETITION THE ALMIGHTY THAT THIS CHAIN OF EVENTS MAY BE AVERTED."> BLACK VOLUME 6: SPLITTING HARES U.S.A.*-G.I. MISSION 1 ART BY MATTHEW WELDON WITH COLORS BY RODRIGO AVILES | MISSION Z ART BY TIMOTHY LIM | WRITTEN BY MARK PELLEGRINI KICKSTARTER FRONT COVER BY NAMI (N_SAKURAJYOUSUI) | INDIEGOGO FRONT COVER BY KIONAOKI2501 | BACK COVERS BY BHUSA SPECIAL THANKS TO YOSHIDA-SAN AND SUDAPIKO FOR TRANSLATION ASSISTANCE

What is Cryptid Lost Media? Youtube: Truth is Scarier than Fiction A cryptid is best defined as an animal that science doesn't recognize as currently existing. Cryptid lost media (CLM) and cryptid lost evidence is evidence of a cryptid's existence that can't be located. Something can still be lost if it's been partially released or if it's location is known, but it hasn't been released to the public. Is CLM ✔ • Lost Photo Thunderbird photo • Jhoor photo Adamsfield thylacine photos 2007 moa photographs A photograph supposedly showing a cryptid. The thunderbird photo, which is purported to show a large unidentified bird or flying reptile, is a lost cryptid photo. Lost Video • McRae Tape Bodette Affolter Film Spiny-backed chimpanzee footage A video supposedly showing a cryptid. The lost McRae tape, allegedly depicting a large unidentified animal in Loch Ness, is a lost cryptid video. Lost Audio Mapinguari audio Enfield horror audio Deepstar 4000 audio Audio allegedly capturing the sound of a cryptid, or the audio of an encounter with a cryptid. David Oren allegedly recorded the mapinguari in Brazil, but the location of this audio is unknown. Lost Specimen Andean wolf pelt Nandi bear skins Long necked seal skin Physical evidence of a cryptid's existence, usually a part of that cryptid that has been preserved in some way. The Nandi Bear, a cryptid from Africa, was allegedly shot and preserved multiple times, but all known specimens of them were lost. The Loch Ness Creature D MURRAY ROSE The Scotsman (1921-1950); Nov 30, 1934; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Scotsman ( Pg. 13 The Loch Ness Creature London, November 28, 1934 SIR, May 1 point out that at various times seals, otters, roe-deer, stags, and a pong were shot or captured in Loch Ness, but that the pre- sence of these did not solve the main mystery? Up to 1828 local tradition was to the effect that a mysterious creature with a head that seemed like Lost Report Vance Devil Diary Loch Trieg Testimony David Murray Rose sighting Von Stein Mokele Mbembe Report A person's recounting of their encounter with a cryptid. History David Murray Rose claimed to have records of numerous pre-1933 sightings of the Loch Ness Monster, but these records were never found. Is not CLMX Dead Cryptids Mapinguari Bodies Globsters A cryptid reportedly being found dead/killed doesn't necessarily mean that there's lost evidence related to it. Unless the cryptid was said to be preserved in some way, it's not lost evidence since it no longer exists. Eaten Cryptids Mokele Mbembe Tankongh A cryptid that was eaten doesn't leave anything behind (unless it was mentioned by the people who ate the cryptid) so a cryptid that gets eaten isn't a piece of lost evidence.

View All 79 Images

More:

Know Your Meme

Like Page 1.8M likes