-
'Getting Your Teacher On A Tangent' Trend Celebrates Wasting Class Time -
Bro Got A Know Your Meme Entry -
That One Edit of Trump In Style Of Ken Carson's 'A Great Chaos' Gets A Boost Following The Election -
Today Marks Three Years Since The 'Badussy War' Started But Some Would Argue That The Conflict's Ongoing -
11 Years Ago, We Began Trying To Figure Out Who Killed Hannibal
-2
The supposedly demonitized video cited in one of the images in this entry is in fact not demonetized
Uploaded by VeteranAdventureHobo Mar 18, 2024 at 12:48AM EDT
Origin Entry: Sweet Baby Inc Detected Controversy
File type: png
Resolution: (769px x 828px)
File size: 608 KB
More:
![Kabrutus @kabrutusrambo Seguir Something's brewing, they are scrubbing numerous pages correlated to the government involvement. If possible, please share this post before they try to remove even more proofs of their action, let everyone see what they are doing. @Grummz @StutteringCraig @thicc_stick_boi @OhNoltsAlexx @RealHypnotic1 @MadamSavvy @YellowFlashGuy @Asmongold @Vara_Dark @DDayCobra @TheQuartering @GundamlsHere @EndymionYT @OrdinaryGamers @Rev_says_desu @elonmusk extremismandgaming.org/members/ web.archive.org/web/2024031420... Traducir post 3:58 p. m. - 17 mar. 2024 - 18,5 mil Reproducciones 45 261 793 71 企 <]](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/776/903/f38.png "there gonna erase any evidence in that woke system...")
![↑ Post ECK PC Focus DRM @PC_Focus_ >One dude created Sweet Baby Steam curator >Sweet Baby harass and tries to ban him >Gamers refuse to buy their s----- games >the ADL is involved now to address extremist gamers Traducir post ADL ADL @ADL - 14 mar. As digital social spaces, online games should be regulated to address hate & extremism. It's vital for Congress to examine extremist radicalization in these spaces & we are grateful to @RepLoriTrahan for leading this effort. An important piece to read: thehill.com/opinion/techno... Mostrar más 8:04 a. m. - 16 mar. 2024 - 17,2 mil Reproducciones WAT 29 1790 Postea tu respuesta 521 , 42 <] ↑ Responder](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/776/383/673.png "analyze that system ADL")
-2
Sweet Baby Inc Detected Controversy - The supposedly demonitized video cited in one of the images in this entry is in fact not demonetized
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![you reliable sources? ikipedia NOTFORUM ntionally uscating facts via offission [hide] This is direct criticism directed towards the Wikipedia editors responsible for the SBI-article as well as those here on the Talk-page refusing to correct misinformation. Repeatedly, registered editors have replied with "do you have reliable sources?" when people explained how the current version of the article is plain wrong. When sources are being mentioned, it is dismissed under the guise of "social media posts are not accepted on Wikipedia". That much would be somewhat okay (albeit still weird in the year 2024, when much official stuff takes place on Twitter and co.), if the consequence then would have been to remove the article due to a lack of sources that display the entire situation. This didn't happen as of now. Instead, websites such as Kotaku, IGN, Eurogamer, Polygon and others are accepted as "reliable sources". The issue here is that all these websites have long joined an ideological side in this dumb "culture war" or whatever you want to call it. I'm not calling for any side, the point is: These traditional news media all intentionally omit key information from their articles, because only so can they push the narrative that SBI critics are "evil". Altright, nazis, women hater, homophobes, transphobes, racists, bigots, etc. - these websites call everyone who dares criticizing SBI that, whether it is directly so or via established wording (like calling it "GamerGate 2.0" which has long since strongly connotated to all the aforementioned insults). And these websites are now accepted as "reliable sources" by Wikipedia-editors such as "Rhaine", "Dumuzid" or "MrOllie" or "Jester". Instead of listening to the people voicing their criticism (we're not doing this for fun ...), we're being further vilified by being told that we "believe" something, when all we're doing is pointing out factual errors. We're being told to make this Talk-page a "battleground", which for all the time being was not the case, again, we were only pointing out factual errors. At this point, it is SO weird how all these registered Wikipedia editors fail to grasp what the issue is: That by omitting one side of the ongoing situation entirely, you create a false image of the situation as a whole. It doesn't matter what side I'm on, behavior like this would be bad for any ongoing situation. Nobody her wants you to change the article to say "the critics of SBI are heroes, fighting for justice". No, all we desire is that you include EVERYTHING in the article. IF that is not possible because you insist on your "social media posts are not allowed as source", then the only reasonable cause of action would be to remove the entire article. Take it offline, wait until the situation is over, then report after the fact when all facts are bared in the open. Right now, the article only benefits bad actors who will use it as ammunition for their agenda ("See, everyone, even Wikipedia says these guys are bad!!1, it's OFFICIAL!!!1"), allthewhile you kept saying that you have no interest in taking a role in this situation. Well, you're doing that right now in this moment. A neutral position would either add key information to the article or, if that's not possible, unpublish it until further information becomes available. After being threatened by Wikipedia editor Jester, I expect the worst after posting this topic, but I also hope that this reaches someone in position of power on Wikipedia who wants to prevent Wikipedia becoming an anti-factual place that exists for pushing agenda that certain editors find themselves siding with. One last time: The critics of SBI are not nazis, nor women haters, nor racists or anything like that. The current version of this Wikipedia-article insinuates exactly that, though. I won't accept being called that. I have done nothing to deserve it. Thx. 2003:D8:8F3C:E000:B8F6:2724:3492:FC17 (talk) 02:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Just to be 100% clear, the underlying complaint here, whether true or not, is that these consultants were responsible for more diversity in video games? Do I have that correct? Dumuzid (talk) 02:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC) No.](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/775/246/7ab.png "As with Gamergate, so with this")
Image Details
1,025 views (8 from today)
Uploaded Mar 18, 2024 at 12:48AM EDT
Origin Entry
Source
About the Uploader
VeteranAdventureHobo
Archivist & Pundit & Media Bus Boy
