-
Cast Your Vote For 'Meme Of The Year' -
See The Winner Of November 2024's Meme Of The Month! -
On This Day Three Years Ago The Viral Mention Of The 'Pharaoh's Curse' Appeared On The Internet -
Nobody Is As Ready For Pillowy Mounds Of Mashed Potatoes As Uncle Phil -
'Thanksgiving Grandma' Plans To Reunite With Mistaken Friend For The 9th Year Since 2016
+74
Based Libertarians
Uploaded by VerdeCreeper Nov 09, 2020 at 08:24AM EST
jo jorgensen libertarian 4chan ancap neocon
Origin Entry: 2020 United States Presidential Election
File type: jpg
Resolution: (1073px x 968px)
File size: 126 KB
More:
+74
2020 United States Presidential Election - Based Libertarians
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![Incumbency advantage In general, an incumbent has a political advantage over challengers at elections. Except when the timing of elections is determined by a constitution or by legislation, the incumbent may have the right to determine the date of an election. For most political offices, the incumbent often has more name recognition due to their previous work in the office. Incumbents also have easier access to campaign finance, as well as government resources (such as the franking privilege) that can be indirectly used to boost the incumbent's re-election campaign. Congressional stagnation is an American political theory that attempts to explain the high rate of incumbency re-election to the United States House of Representatives. In recent years this rate has been well over 90 per cent, with rarely more than 5-10 incumbents losing their House seats every election cycle.11 The theory has existed since the 1970s, when political commentators were beginning to notice the trend,2 with political science author and professor David Mayhew first writing about the "vanishing marginals" theory in 1974.131 Anti-incumbency Main article: anti-incumbency However, there exist scenarios in which the incumbency factor itself leads to the downfall of the incumbent. Popularly known as the anti- incumbency factor, situations of this kind occur when the incumbent has proven himself not worthy of office during his tenure and the challengers demonstrate this to the voters. An anti-incumbency factor can also be responsible for bringing down incumbents who have been in office for many successive terms despite performance indicators, simply because the voters are convinced by the challengers of a need for change. It is also argued that the holders of extensively powerful offices are subject to immense pressure which leaves them politically impotent and unable to command enough public confidence for re- election; such is the case, for example, with the Presidency of France.17] In recent years this rate has been well over 90 per cent, with rarely more than 5-10 incumbents losing their House seats every election cycle.](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/934/706/9bd.png "Welcome to the 10% Club, Donny.")
Image Details
10,893 views (6 from today)
Uploaded Nov 09, 2020 at 08:24AM EST
Origin Entry
Tags
About the Uploader
