Howdy! You must login or signup first!

SUPPLEMENT7/17/10 9:58 t ID Number: 996Officer N FOLLOW UP ON 071610, WRITER WAS WORKING AT THE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (DCF) INVESTIGATOR TARLIECE CHAVERS, WHO WAS RESPONDING TO A RESIDENCE IN AND MADE CONTACT IN REFERENCE TO YEAR OLD GIRL POSTING INAPPROPRIATE THINGS ON THE INTERNET WRITER ASSISTED THE INVESTIGATOR AT THE RESIDENCE AND MADE CONTACT WITH AND HER PARENTS WRITER STOOD BY AS THE INVESTIGATOR CONDUCTED HER INTERVIEWS, AND AT ONE POINT, THE JUVENILE SUBJECT THREW A TEMPER TANTRUM AFTER BOTH THE INVESTIGATOR AND WRITER REQUESTED THE COMPUTER BE UNPLUGGED AND THE JUVENILE NOT TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE INTERNET, WHICH THE JUVENILE BECAME IRATE AND ADVISED SHE WILL LOSE HER FAME, AND THAT SHE WILL GET TO THE INTERNET ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. WRITER OBSERVED THE JUVENILE STATE THAT IF SHE DOES NOT GET ON THE INTERNET, SHE HAS NOTHING ELSE TO LIVE FOR, AT WHICH TIME, SHE GOT UP FROM THE DINING ROOM TABLE, STORMED OUT OF THE ROOM, STATING SHE DOES NOT "GIVE A F---", AND THAT SHE WILL STICK A BUTCHER KNIFE IN THE DCF WORKER'S ASS". WRITER OBSERVED THE JUVENILE STATE SHE DOES NOT WISH TO LIVE ANYMORE, AND MADE OTHER STATEMENTS IN THAT ASPECT. WRITER MADE THE DECISION TO PLACE THE JUVENILE UNDER A BAKER ACT, AT WHICH TIME, DEPUTY FROST, ID 5451, RESPONDED AND TRANSPORTED THE JUVENILE TO THE CENTERS, REFERENCE CASE MS CHAVERS STATED SHE IS GOING TO REVIEW THIS CASE WITH HER SUPERVISORS AND WILL MAKE A DETERMINATION AT THAT TIME IF THE JUVENILE SHOULD BE PLACED ELSEWHERE. THE PARENTS OF THE JUVENILE SUBJECT WERE CATERING TO THE JUVENILE AS IF SHE HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG. IT DID COME OUT THAT THE JUVENILE WAS POSING HERSELF IN PROVOCATIVE POSITIONS AND POSTING THE PICTURES ON THE INTERNET THE JUVENILE DID STATE THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN HER LIFE AT THIS TIME IS TO MAKE NUMBER ONE ON SOME LIST ON WHICH SHE IS CURRENTLY 67 OUT OF 100 AND THAT HER MAIN GOAL IS TO BE FAMOUS ON THE INTERNET, AND FOR HER NAME TO BE A HOUSEHOLD NAME THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY. WRITER DID ADVISE THE JUVENILE AND REMINDED HER SHE IS ONLY STATED SHE DID NOT "GIVE A F---" AND THAT AGE IS NOT IMPORTANT. THE JUVENILE DID SHOW WRITER HER INTERNET PAGE, WHICH WRITER DID OBSERVE POSTINGS FROM OTHER PEOPLE STATING WHAT THE JUVENILE WAS DOING WAS WRONG, AND JUST TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SCREEN, WRITER OBSERVED IN PLAIN VIEW P----------, PICTURES OF ORAL SEX, WHICH THE PARENTS STATED THEY WERE UNAWARE THEIR DAUGHTER WAS ON SUCH A PAGE. YEARS OLD, WHICH THE JUVENILE THE DCF INVESTIGATOR DID TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SCREEN, WHICH SHE STATED WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE DECISION MAKING IN THIS CASE. THE FATHER DID BECOME COMBATIVE WHEN WRITER TOLD HIM HIS DAUGHTER WAS UNDER A BAKER ACT, AT WHICH TIME, HE STEPPED IN FRONT OF WRITER TO BLOCK HIS PATH TO GET TO THE JUVENILE, WHICH WRITER EXPLAINED TO THE FATHER THAT HE WILL BE ARRESTED FOR OBSTRUCTION IF HE OBSTRUCTS WRITER'S INVESTIGATION IN ANY WAY THIS CONCLUDES WRITER'S INVOLVEMENT IN THIS CASE CASE REMAINS PENDING ACTIVE

+1

Image #147,260


Uploaded by Chris Menning Jul 11, 2011 at 05:42PM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Jessi Slaughter Cyberbulling Controversy

File type: jpg

Resolution: (750px x 970px)

File size: 753 KB


I DUN GOOFD?! THE NO, I BACKTRACED!
CYBER INVESTIGATION UNIT YOU HAVE BEEN BACKTRACED
CONSEQUECES YouTube WILL NEVER BE THE SAME
View All 252 Images


More:

+ Add an Image

Image Details

626 views (1 from today)

Uploaded Jul 11, 2011 at 05:42PM EDT

Origin Entry

Jessi Slaughter Cyberbulling Controversy

Tags

No tags

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed