-2
Look who else mentions "Beach Week"?
Uploaded by BrentD15 Sep 27, 2018 at 07:46AM EDT
brett kavanaugh sexual assault beach week
Origin Entry: Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court Nomination
File type: jpg
Resolution: (1125px x 1125px)
File size: 173 KB
![tilS MODLRI WORLby TOM TOMORROW HE DEFINITELY DIDN'T DO IT OR AT LEAST, HE PROBABLYOKAY MAYBE HE DID IT BUT HIS ACCUSER IS CLEARLY MAKINGDIL THE WHOLE THING UP! SHE JUST 65 WOMEN WHO KNEW HIM IN WANTS THE ATTENTION! DIDN'T DO IT IT WAS JUST A YOUTHFUL INDISCRETION YOU CAN'T HOLD 5OMEONE RE SPONSIBLE FOR SOMETHING THEY DID AT THE AGE OF 17 HIGH SCHOOL HAVE VOUCHED FOR HIS CHARACTER! WHAT POSSIBLÉ DOWNER, YES SIDE COULD THERE BE WELL-- FOR HER? MEAN, EX- MOVING CEPT FOR THE DOXXINGRIGHT AND THE DEATH THREATS? ALONG.. WHiCH IS EXTRA IMPRES- 5IVE, SINCE HE WENT TO AN ALL-BoYS SCHOOL UNLESS THEY'RE POOR AND BLACK THEN YOu CAN. THE DOPPELGÄNGER THEORY BUT THIS IS ABSOLUTELY RUSHING To JUDGMENT IS GOOD, ACTUALLY SoMEONE WHo SIMPLY BORE AN WE DON'T HAVE TIME FOR THIS!DON'T WORRY, LADIES! KAVANAUGH UNCANNY RESEMBLANCE TO JUDGE KAVANAUGH! NOT ABOUT ABORTION SAYS ROE I5 SETTLED PRECEDENT! ALS0, IT'S TOTALLYYOU'RE NOT THE SENATE MUST CONFIRM HIS LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE HIGHEST COURT IN THE LAND MAYBE A LONG WE CAN'T RULEWITHOUT DELAY! LOST EVIL TWIN!ANYTHING OUT! ABOUT ABORTION. HELPING. BECAUSE REASONS! EXCEPT THAT HER STORY MIGHT BE TRUE OH, THE INJUSTICE OF IT ALL IF THIS WOMAN CAN DERAIL KAV-z ANAUGH--NO MAN IS SAFE AT LEAST, NO MAN WE KNow.!]](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/414/835/f9a.jpg "\"Kavalcade of Kavanaugh\" by Tom Tomorrow")
![it was reportedly Senate Democratic staff who conveyed the allegations to the media rather than alert Republican staff to conduct a bipartisan investigation. Finally, you ask that the FBI investigate Ms. Ramirez's claims. As you know, Judge Kavanaugh has gone through six FBI background investigations over the past 25 years. The FBI's investigations covered his time at Yale and uncovered nothing remotely similar to the misconduct alleged by Ms. Ramirez. Additionally, as the New Yorker story itself states, the publication could "not confirm] with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party." And the New York Times spoke to several dozen people to corroborate Ms. Ramirez's allegations but "could find no one with firsthand knowledge." Indeed, the Times reports that Ms. Ramirez herself said she could not be sure Judge Kavanaugh did what she alleged in the New Yorker article. It's not clear how the FBI could further illuminate what transpired at a dormitory party 35 years ago. Even the liberal New York Times did not find these allegations "fit to print.'" As of now, the only allegations of which the Committee is aware with respect to Ms. Ramirez are the allegations described in the New Yorker. As you know, false statements made to the press are not subject to criminal penalty, but false statements to Congress are. If Ms. Ramirez submit:s testimony and evidence to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which Committee investigators have requested, we can decide how to proceed. But, at this time, Democratic staff has not shared any such evidence it has with Republican staff. And, because Ms. Ramirez's allegations are unrelated to Dr. Ford's, there is no reason at all to delay the hearing on Thursday in light of these new allegations. Sincerely, Chuck Grassley Chairman](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/414/568/b3b.jpg "Grassley letter to Feinstein (part 2)")
