Editor's comments | Milo Yiannopoulos | Know Your Meme

Comment IA474) NO IT HAS NOT

Share Pin Download More

milo yiannopoulos editor's comments dangerous

Origin Entry: Milo Yiannopoulos

File type: jpg

Resolution: (785px x 224px)

File size: 22.1 KB

C-- ing of Age Relationships

MILO Y iAN N O P0 ULO S ARI SHAFFIR S SKEPTIC TANK # 370 TROLL

Milo: "The law is probably about right, that's probably roughly the right age. I think it's probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age, I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who are sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world by the way. In many cases actually those relation ships with older men...This is one reason I hate the left. This stupid one size fits all policing of culture. (People speak over each other). This sort of arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent, which totally destroys you know understanding that many of us have. The complexities and subtleties and complicated nature of many relationships. You know, people are messy and complex. In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships etween younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relation ships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can't speak to their parents Some of those relationships are the most-"

View All 115 Images

Moar:

Editor's comments

- comment TA393E e eleaves re a耗waste analogiez out of this chapter

Pin

Editor's comments

Comment [A205], Stick with virgios FeivertSiisunne essary,'…

Pin

Editor's comments

Comment [A2721. Absurd name calling

Pin

Editor's comments

comment 1A4581 This would never happen -fcomment[A459]: Thisisnottruemea Comment 1a460], Tis is not true either

Pin

Editor's comments

1 Comment [A416]: Delete entire Chapter The book is better overall without rittino these to people notes in the other chapters and better overall by delcting this one

Pin

Dangerous is basically unreadable. I saw a thread where the OP focused solely on the editorial comments and I see why.

Dangerous is basically unreadable. I saw a thread where the OP focused solely on the editorial comments and see why. One of the two is clearly wrong, but their confusion-butlbust is so glorious that I almost don't want to correct either one of them. That is trolling them In my trollery, I am surpassed only by one man, or, rather one God-Emperor: Donald Trump, a man who essentially trolled his way to the presidency. Like me, Daddy, as I like to call him (in itself another troll, only went after deserving targets: the media, Hillary and Bill Clinton, political correctness A master showman, Donald J. Trump can command the media's attention despite the fact that most of their leading lights despise him. Forcing people who hate you and everything you stand for to point cameras at you for over a year? That's a level of trolling I can only hope to achieve one day

Pin

here's how a conservative editor seeks to whitewash Milo into something more acceptable and profitable

here's how a conservative editor seeks to whitewash Milo into something more acceptable and profitable Comment tA1]: Add a short and serious statement here that sets out why you do what you do without trolling without bombaSt without narme caling, and without ego This will make for a stronger opening than playing to your core audience Make the pont that in each and every chapter of this book what you intend to show is the stifling of soeech Acknow edge that you use bombast and over the top messaging n an attempt to break the strictures on free expression in the same way that comedians ike Lernny Bruce once did And make the point that liberals used to defend free speech out that the snoe the aovent of political correctness the iliberal left has become the oppressive censors in American society

Pin

here's the PDF link to Milo's manuscript with commentary from the editor. An interesting insight into an attempt to launder fascist views into mainstream consumption

here's the PDF link to Milo's manuscript with commentary from the editor. An interesting insight into an attempt to launder fascist views into mainstream consumption iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/Documen tD ?amp=1

Pin

Will immediately start using “if you want to make a case for [fucking ridiculous thing], you’re going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here.” 🔥🔥🔥

Will immediately start using "if you want to make a case for [f------ ridiculous thing], you're going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here." Comment [A3131 This entire section is the most poorly thouoht out section i the book f yot want to make a case for gay mee going back into the closet and marrying women just to have children you te going to have to employ a lot more intelectua ngor than you use here Comment 4314] Thisjust doesnt any make sense hre Comment [A3151. Tnat does NOT nebessarilyfollow.

Pin

I didn’t read the manuscript. Just the comments. They’re...amazing. Even better than the excerpts in the filing. And a pretty good summary of the book I imagine.

l didn't read the manuscript. Just the comments. They're...amazing. Even better than the excerpts in the filing And a pretty good summary of the book l imaaine Comment [A164] No, t this at all Comment [A165]: Graf Comment [A166]: 1w mentally il Comment [411] Ctators neede e at abes Comment [A279]: Not a sertence Comment [A 280]: Le's loave-cuck, Q nem of it ,' , .| comment [A281): This whole paragrapn is e comment 14121 Delete ifrelevan supermluous ethnic joke Comment 14405sc anurtchangea in 0e in tis peticulaly chapter do NOT ligmen cur mesenge with huyar Thay srbly diminish Comment [A4081: Tisis not the ame or orurcther hhrk d---

Pin

I went to the New York county clerk’s website and found this filing. It includes the entire manuscript with allllllll the editor’s comments as exhibit B.

I went to the New York county clerk's website and found this filing. It includes the entire manuscript with alllIII the editor's comments as exhibit B Pinter @jasonpinter is section of Simon & Schuster's rebuttal to Milo's lawsuit over DANGEROUS.

Pin

This section of Simon & Schuster’s rebuttal to Milo’s lawsuit over DANGEROUS. 🤭

Jason Pinter @jasonpinter This section of Simon & Schuster's rebuttal to Milo's lawsuit over DANGEROUS E-mail"), summarizing the conversation he had with Plaintiff and his agent the day before in which he outlined his editorial concerns with the manuscript, including seven most critical overarching issues. He explained that these are the seven main issues that must be addressed in the revised manuscript, in addition to the edits and queries throughout." Ivers Aff. Ex. C. In particular, Ivers noted that the Why Establishment Gays Hate Me" chapter "needs a better central thesis than the notion that gay pcople should go back in thc closet" and the feminist chapter needed a "stronger argument against feminism than saying that they are ugly and sexless and have cats." Id Ivers made it clear that Plaintiffs first draft was not acceptable to the publisher: t goes without saying, that in addition to these seven points, given the level of revision being requested, we reserve the right of additional review and discussion of Ivers comments on the draft manuscript were even more detailed in identifying the substantial concerns the publisher had with the manuscript and spelling out what "revisions, changes or supplements" were needs to be a Preamble "On Freedom of Speech and Political Correctness" that would be a "short and serious statement here that sets out why you do what you do, without trolling, without hombast, without name-calling, and without ego." Id at 3. See also, eg, id. at 13 ("avoid gratuitous insults"), 17 (Unclear, unfunny, delete), 20 (This entire paragraph is just repeating Fake News.", 34 (MAJOR POINT. You will have to address the charge of racism clearly and with greater depth, 62 (when you discuss Leslie Jones in this book - AND YOU MUST), 107 ("This section feels phenomenally petty), 132 (This whole section has to go Too much ego"), 198 ("This entire argument is ridiculous", 146 (This entire section is the most poorly thought out section in the book."), 206 (This... doesn't make sense or pass intellectual muster. It's just trolling on an issue that many readers.might take scriously". As Ivers January 14 E-mail and manuscript comments demonstrate, Ivers considered Plaintiff's first draft to be, at best, a superficial work full of incendiary jokes with no coherent or sophisticated analysis of political issues of free speech. Ivers Aff. 11 15-16. Plainly, it was not acceptable to Simon & Schuster for publication. Id required. Ivers Aff. Ex. B. At the outset, he observed that there Under the Agreement, the determination as to whether the manuscript was "editorially acceptable" must be made "within 45 days." Agrm. 3(a) Given the crash schedule, Ivers made that determination and provided the editorial request in writing for revisions and changes within less than two weeks of receipt of the manuscript. 4819.9829.7688.12 3901014000688 11 of 31 INDEX NO. 65 C. NO. 62 RECEIVED NYScEF. 1:

Pin

Know Your Meme

Like Page 1.8M likes