Trump's Signature Statement ver. 2 | Russiagate | Know Your Meme

Further, certain provisions, such as sections 254 and 257, purport to direct my subordinates in the executive branch to undertake certain diplomatic initiatives, in contravention of the President's exclusive constitutional authority to determine the time, scope, and objectives of international negotiations. And other provisions, such as sections 104, 107, 222, 224, 227, 228, and 234, would require me to deny certain individuals entry into the United States, without an exception for the President's responsibility toreceive ambassadors under ArticleII, section3 of the Constitution. My Administration will give careful and respectful consideration to the preferences expressed by the Congress in these various provisions and will implement them ina manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to conduct foreign relations. STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT Today, I have signed into law H.R. 3364, the "Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act." While I favor tough measures to punish and deter aggressive and destabilizing behavior by Iran, North Korea, and Russia, this legislation is significantly flawed In its haste to pass this legislation, the Congress included a number of clearly unconstitutional provisions. For instance, although I share the policy views of sections 253 and 257, those pro the President's exclusive constitutional authority to recognize foreign governments, including their territorial bounds, in conflict with the Supreme Court's recent decision in "Zivotofsky v. Kerry" visions purport to displace Finally, my Administration particularly expects the Congress to refrain from using this flawed bill to hinder our important work with Europear allies to resolve the conflict in Ukraine, and from using it to hinder our efforts to address any unintended consequences it may have for American businesses, our friends, or our allies Additionally, section 216 seeks to grant the Congress the ability to change the law outside the constitutionally required process. The bill prescribes a review period that precludes the President from taking certain actions Certain provisions in section 216, however, conflict with the Supreme Court's decision in "INS v. Chadha", because they purport to allow the Congress to extend the review period through procedures that do not satisfy the requirements for changing the law under Article I, section 7 of the Constitution. I nevertheless expect to honor the bill's extended waiting periods to ensure that the Congress will have afull opportunity to avail itself of the bill's review procedures DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE August 2, 2017

Share Pin Download More

russiagate donald trump russia iran north korea china sanctions

Origin Entry: Russiagate

File type: jpg

Resolution: (1928px x 1035px)

File size: 548 KB

NO COLLUSION NO OBSTRUCTION FOR THE HATERS AND THE RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS GAME-GIVER

Dr Shaym 18 hours ago You are showing flat Earther levels of denial if you believe there's even the slimmest possibility that Trump will still be convicted of collusion with Russia after today. We're looking at 2,800 subpoenas, nearly 500 search warrants, more than 230 orders for communication records, almost 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers, 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence, and interviews with 500 witnesses over the course of 22 months. The 9/11 attacks weren't investigated this thoroughly. It's over. Trump is drinking your milkshake.

PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE3 Concocte Delussional Allegations, Demand, then Ignore, all Investigation(s.).. RUSSIAN riCOLLUSION DNC

View All 606 Images

More:

Know Your Meme

Like Page 1.8M likes