Hi! You must login or signup first!

In the aftermath of Christmas dinner, I have discovered a flaw in Funny Valentine's philosophy Part Seven SpoilerS) (self.Sta submitted 14 hours ago by locustking14 This evening I was pleased to be invited to a parent's friend's house for a lovely Christmas dinner. When it was time to eat, we all took our seats around the table. I was delighted to notice to my left and to my right a folded paper napkin, and while no one else at the table was aware of the significance of the action I brazenly took the napkin to my right The result of my taking the first napkin was underwhelming. Across the table, a grandma who had not noticed my action took the napkin to her left. A few seats to my left was a place at the table that was set but had no one sitting at it. And a few seats to my right was a guy who ended up not picking up a napkin at all. Thus, as my twisting the arm of fate propagated like faling dominoes to my right, when it reached the point where the guy should have picked up his right napkin and did not the impetus of the action ceased. To the grandma's right, two people took their left napkins but then it got to the empty place, which was skipped, and at least one person to my left now had free will to choose whichever napkin they pleased. Because of the guy who didn't take a napkin, there was no clash where the left-takers of the grandma's side and the right-takers of my side met like the waters of two seas colliding, which should have resulted in one person not getting a napkin and having to take it from the empty place In short, I took the first napkin, and anarchy ensued as people completely disregarded the firm law that had been implicitly established My question is then, what would Funny Valentine make of this napkin conundrum? In his extended metaphor in which the taking of the napkin correlates to the establishment of societal norms and social contracts, how can one account for the random variables of the ignorant, apathetic, or absent? For people like the grandma who do not realize the structure of society around them and act on their own against the flow of reason, for people like the guy who consider themselves sufficient without the aid of society and who will turn aside the pressure of conformity, or for people like the absentee who remove themselves from the situation in which social norms dictate proper behavior? How would Funny Valentine reconcile with these mavericks?

+41

Napkins and Anarchy


Uploaded by Blue Sun Deluxe Dec 26, 2016 at 08:06AM EST

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: JoJo's Bizarre Adventure

File type: png

Resolution: (873px x 449px)

File size: 75.4 KB


Silver hair anine girls are so cute
It... It's blood...
Wanted to kill the boss What if You imgp.com Araki said Main antagonist
View All 66,459 Images

Load 10 Comments

Moar:

+ Add an Image

Image Details

7,486 views (7 from today)

Uploaded Dec 26, 2016 at 08:06AM EST

Origin Entry

JoJo's Bizarre Adventure

Source

r/StardustCrusaders

Tags

napkin, jojo, funny valentine, christmas dinner, jjba, reddit, philosophy

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed