Recieves $500,000 in donations / Wastes it on a video that talks about virtual characters butts | Anita Sarkeesian | Know Your Meme

RECIEVES $500,000 IN DONATIONS Strategic Butt Coverings - Tropes vs Women in Video Games feministfrequency Subscribe 207,113 203,329 WASTES IT ON A VIDEO THAT TALKS ABOUT VIRTUAL CHARACTER BUTTS

Share Pin Download More

feminist frequency donations youtube anita sarkeesian feminist video butts

Origin Entry: Anita Sarkeesian

File type: jpg

Resolution: (1069px x 1069px)

File size: 217 KB

: Anonymous L [Advertise on 4chan] 11/01/23(Wed) 22:54:41 No.656084159 thedevil.jpg 169 KB JPG >destroys video games forever, leaving them with an irreparable mark that resonates to this day >gets away with it

ANITA SARKEESIAN SUCKS AT VIDYA

DIGITAL YAAAAAY I'M A GOOD MALE FEMINIST ALLY!!! I HOPE I'LL HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO Thanks for donating $15K to me, Devolver Digital. You're a good male ally. I'Il let you know if I needed more money. DONATE TO YOU AND HAVE ENOUGH GOOD BOY POINTS TO BE REWARDED WITH SEX!!!!

View All 279 Images

Load 28 Comments

More:

We're not here to take your toys away!... Just to smear the devs until they obey us.

IAN SARKEESIAN EMPHASIZED THAT ONE OF GAMERS CAN THE BEST WAYS CHAN CUILTURE IS THROUGH GAME GE THE REVIEWS GETTING BAD REVIEWS MAKES PAY ATTENTION EM REALLY TH TO WHAT WE RE SAYING HTTP//ARCHIVE.IS/BOO "DRAGON'S CROWN IS A FANTASY-OBSESSED TEENAGED BOY'S DREAM: CRAZY, VIOLENT AND FULL OF IMPOSSIBLY LARGE BREASTS." Only On POLYGoN METASCORE 65/10082/100 HTTPS://ARCHIVE.IS/SYSHR BAYONETTA 2'S BLATANT OVER-SEXUALIZATION PUTS A BIG DENT IN AN OTHERWISE GREAT GAME" POLYGONMETASCORE 75/100 91/100 HTTPS://ARCHIVE.IS/SLSVT "EMBARRASSING TAWDRY, SEXIST AND ARGUABLY RACIST CRAP." DEPONIA ROCK PAPER SHOTGUN "NO SCORE BUT DISPLAYED IN METACRITIC METASCORE 78/100 HTTP://ARCHIVE.IS/CEMW 12 THIS IS THE PARANOID FANTASY OF THE RIGHT-WING BROUGHT INTO DISTURBING ACTUALIZATION REFUSES TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS REPRESENTATIONS FOR ITS POLITICS IF WE WANT THAT TO CHANGE WE HAVE TO MAKE IT, AND ITS TOM NCY'S VIS CREATORS, RESPONSIBL KILLSCREEN METASCORE 50/10081/100 HTTP://ARCHIVE.IS/2K6MO A MAJORITY OF YOUR TIME IN XTREME 3 XTREME 3IS SPENT SPLIT BETWEEN THREE DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES MINI-GAMES, GAMBLING, AND CREEPING ON GIRLS" THE REASON MOST PEOPLE BUY THIS GAME IS TO CREEP ON VIRTUAL GIRLS DESTRUCTOID METASCORE 15/100 HTTPS://ARCHIVE.IS/ORX8S

Pin

PAPER Magazine March 2016 Captioned

"ONE REPERCUSSION OF CONSTANTLY RELYING ON FEMINIZING SIGNIFIERS FOR CHARACTER DESIGNISTHAT IT TENDSTO REINFORCE A STRICT BINARYFORM OF GENDER EXPRESSION ANITA SARKEESIAN MS MALE CHARACTER MARCH 2016 $10 "THE GENDER BINARY IS AN ENTIRELY ARTIFICIALAND SOCIALLYCONSTRUCTED DIVISION OF MALE AND FEMALE INTO TWO DISTINCTLY SEPARATE AND OPPOSING CLASSES OF HUMAN BEING THEGENDERBINARY ALSO ERASES THECONTINUUM OF GENDER PRESENTATIONS ANDIDENTITIES THAT FALL OUTSIDEOF THERIGID MASCULINE/FEMININE FALSE DICHOTOMY AND WITHIN THATSTRICT BINARY, WOMEN ARE MARKED WHILEMENGETTOREMAIN LARGELY UNMARKED ANITASARKEESIAN.MS. MALE CHARACTER

Pin

#FreeLaurenSouthern

FIGHTS FOR CENSORSHIP FIGHTS FOR FREE SPEECH 3 GETS CENSORED ON ALL SOCIAL NETWORKS GAINS CONTROL OF TWITTER #FREELAURENSOUTHERN

Pin

Game dev American McGee on Anita Sarkeesian

American McGee Its not the views she's after. It's the outrage and abuse. Lets watch her videos and debate them. Deconstructing her arguments and proving the emperor has no clothes is our right. What we dont want to do, ever, is insult, threaten, or otherwise harass her (or anyone else for that matter). She doesn't make these videos because she has a verifiable point about games/media causing violence/sexism against women. Look at her face in this most recent video. She knows the topic is ridiculous as the rest of us. I imagine the outtakes from this one to be hilarious. To be clear: She makes these videos to attract abuse. As the abuse wanes, the videos become more outrageous. She then turns around and uses that abuse to advocate for "online controls to protect women." Watch her performance at the UN. Ask yourself why she was invited to Google ldeas. Control is the end goal Watching her videos and debating them doesnt get her there. Hurling abuse at her does This also illustrates why her supporters are so vicious. They're baiting anyone who might express a counter-opinion, in hopes of securing evidence for the necessity of online controls to limit free expression There was a beautiful example of this behavior in the comments above- a troll, flinging constant insults, begging for someone to insult him. As soon as he got his wish, he turned around and played the victim, Youve proved my point. Keep it in mind. This isn't a discussion about women in video games Its a fight for free expression across corporate platforms that have become the virtual public square. Its a wedge to create division across online mediums where free expression by independent artists and commentators can still reach an audience of billions *Note: I'm guessing at Anita's end goal. It could be she honestly believes what she's preaching, though the recent outtakes video made it clear she doesnt take any of these topics seriously. She could be in it for the money as many have suggested for obvious reasons. She could be aligned with Google and Facebook in an effort to enforce online controls. Or, perhaps more likely, she's a pawn whose agenda conveniently aligns with the larger goals of Google, Facebook, and government. The tools for censorship she helps to bring into existence will someday be used to suppress her expression as well Like 1. 48 mins . Edited

Pin

Twitter Trust and Safety Council

CRAFTING TWITTER'S NEW FREE SPEECH POLICIES DOESNTALLOWICOMMENTSON HERVIDEOS CALLS ALL:CRITICISM HARASSMENT imgfip.com

Pin

"Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me."

Rob Simple 2 days ago t3 IM So you're telling me TotalBiscuit can get diagnosed with cancer, undergo chemo, (all while people were sending him messages saying they hoped he didn't survive,) and he STILL manages put out work on a regular basis, but Anita needs to cancel her one- episode-every-six-months show because of her hurt feelings? Please tell me again how this KS wasn't a scam from start to finish

Pin

The Strategic Male Butt Covering

"For the purposes of this video fied to get a glimpse of Batman's rear end but it's as if his cape is a high-tech piece of Wayne Industries equipment designed to cover up his butt at all costs. I like to jokingly refer to this aspect of a male character's costume as the strategic butt covering."

Pin

Strategic Butt Coverings In A Nutshell

GE Exit full screern 谷MMET 360 More butts 18 REMEMBER Exit full screen Too many butts.." Exit full screen and boohs

Pin

The tragedy of Anita Sarkeesian

>> O Anonymous 01/01/16(Fri)12:22:46 No.64327482 >>64329434竺643308342264334000 File: anakin-palpatine.ipg (10 KB, 500x211) have you ever heard the tragedy of Anita Sarkeesian? no. l thought not, it's not a pasta the janitors would let you see. It's a feminist legend... Anita Sarkeesian was a youtube eceleb so powerful, and so manipulative, she could use feminism to influence the millenials to create... Social justice. She had such a knowledge of feminism, she could even have people give her hundreds of thousands of dollars and press attention... for doing nothing she could actually... get money, for free? identity politics are a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural >what happened to her she became so powerful, the only thing she was afraid of was... losing her power- which eventually of course, she did. Unfortunately, she taught her followers everything she knew, then her followers made their own twitters and youtube channels and leeched her subscriber base away. Ironic. She could save feminism from irrelevancy... but not herself. is it possible to lean this power? >Not from anon.

Pin

Anita Sarkeesian's "Values and Concepts of Normalcy"

Anita Sarkeesian's "Values and Concepts of Normalcy" One of Anita Sarkeesian's more controversial statements is: We must remember that games don't just entertain. Intentional or not, they always express a set of values and present us with concepts of normalcy. It's easy to show that, taken in one sense, this is false. But in another sense it seems true. I thought it was worth remarking on this, because it is a TRICK that Anita makes use of. Ayn Rand is very fond of this same trick; those of you who know her, will recognize it in action. Anita's statement is ambiguous. It may be read in at least two senses. In Sense 1, it is true but trivial. In Sense 2, it is important but false SENSE 1 is that games "express values and concepts of normalcy" in the way any kind of stories do. In other words, it amounts to the claim "stories are stories" or "stories do the things that stories do." This is, as I noted, true but trivial. Of course stories are stories and do story things. SENSE 2 is that the stories presented by games have a profound and powerful impact on those who behold them, even a little bit, and have the power to brainwash, condition, or fundamentally alter a person's attitudes and beliefs, with the mildest amount of exposure. This is an interesting and serious claim; it is also not true. It is important but false. THE TRICK is this: When Anita needs to argue her thesis is true, she appeals to the true but trivial sense. But when she needs to make judgments about what should be done, calls to action or reform, she appeals no sense 2, the important but false version of the claim But since Sense 2 is false, there is no reason to act on it, by e.g. reforming video games. As a further example, Ayn Rand does this with the term "selfish." She argues that all human actions are "selfish" in that they involve the self (true but trivial). But then she claims that all human actions are selfish in another sense, that is, they should be for the sake of the good one's self and no one else. The is a much more substantial claim, from which she seeks to derive her ethics. Unfortunately, this claim is important but false. She can only get it to be "true" by appealing to the other sense. But this is simply a fallacy of ambiguity or equivocation You can do something similar with the term "subjective." You can point out that "All knowledge is subjective because it involves the mind, that is, the subject." This is true but trivial. All knowledge does indeed involve a subjective aspect, the knowing mind. But then you can try to argue that "all knowledge is subjective" in the sense of being person-dependent, such that each person gets to decide what counts a knowledge. That is a much more substantial claim, but it shifts the meaning of the term subjective," so that the claim is now important but false. The fact that minds are part of knowing doesn't mean that minds make truth or that objective knowledge is impossible.

Pin

So much about charity

SAN FRAN HIPSTERS MAKING MILLIONS OFF LOBBYING GAMING Jonathan Mcintosh Follow $158,922 These clowns honestly and sincerely believe that feminist pledgedof $0 media criticism and academic games analysis are lucrative endeavors. It's asinine. https:l/archive.is/EHcOY Anita Sarkeesian San Francisco, CA Feminist Frequency @femfreq Donate $10+ to Feminist Frequency before the new year & we'll send you a sticker! feministfrequency.com/donate/ Feminist Frequency 1d Help us keep producing ad-free feminist media criticism by donating todayl 2014 REVENUE NotMyCupOTea Dragon Voyager 2m @femfreq Didn't your organization receive 400k from Intel less than a year ago?ONEO You haven't created enough content in 2015 to burn thru that REVENUE Q 39,082 23 1 DONATION REVENUE Q2 3,569 Total: $441,930 REVENUE Q4 397,778 Lt. Littlehandrichilewww 3m DONATION @femtreq Looking at your financial report, it looks like you should have at least a couple hundred thousand remaining in your war chest REVENUEQL 1,503 23 WHILE PRETENDING TO BE A NON-PROFIT CHARITY

Pin

The real reason for lack of female characters (SOLUTION!)

Alright! Time to write a female character for my video game! Hmm, alright. Let's see I guess I can't Make her a villain, because that means that I would be portraying women in a negative misogynous tone Make her overly attractive because I would be perpetuating the stereotype that only attractive women are heroic. This would also promote sexual objectification of women. Make her ugly because then I'd be saying that only unattractive women can get things done I'd also make unattractive women feel bad instead of empowering them - Make her the sidekick of a male character, because that would imply that she's subservient to his whims, and that she is not equal. Make her the sidekick of a female character because that would imply that women cannot work together, or that one is more equal to the other 剭 Make her the hero, because that would just be a male 'fantasy'. Having her kick ass and win the day would just be enforcing negative stereotypes. - Make her strong and willful and muscular because that would mean I'm just making a male character with breasts. which women find offensive since it rejects femininity Make her girly, feminine and sensitive, because that would mean that women cannot be strong, independent and powerful. Make a female character at all because no matter what I do, feminists will ALWAYS bitch about any aspect they can dig out of the box, because it is their hobby and that's what they do for a living, claiming to be oppressed by the "patriarchy" while women in a few 3rd world countries are truly subjected to discrimination SOLUTION: Something like the examples provided below: (The legend of the last princess) (Towel Fall) (Sword & Sworcery) (Beyond Good and Evil) I'm not entirely sure what makes these characters stick out as positive in terms of their roles and designs, but these female characters are actually seen as positive even by those normally thought to be unpleasable. We should analyze/study them so we can figure out what makes them not offensive to feminists. Then perhaps it would be easier to create female characters who are innovative and progressive in terms of designs and portrayal for better female representation in video games It is possible to make non-offensive female video game characters; you just need to try harder Never underestimate the creativity the human mind is capable of and don't be afraid to think outside the box. There is no need to change the characters we already have, but maybe it's time try to create new kinds of characters for a modern audience regardless. But if you wish to create your own characters your own way for your own personal project and design them the way you want: That's fine, no one can stop you. u create something for everyone, you s hould do exactly that. Kee p as many people's interests But when yo in mind as you can and be considerate that there are more people you can satisfy than just your own usual target demographic.

Pin

Know Your Meme

Like Page 1.8M likes